Here is the link to the actual article from the newspaper in question.
Apparently it is true, including the $1 in damages.
I guess they aren't that pissed.


http://www.pantagraph.com/stories/073004/new_20040730034.shtml

  _____  

From: S. Isaac Dealey
Somehow I doubt that any newspaper is seeking damages in court of only
_one_ dollar. Which either means this was faked, or someone(s) at the
Chicago Tribune doesn't know how to do their job as an editor.
<http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=35>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to