including Blix, thought that he had them and that he was playing with Blix,
preventing him from doing his job until he thought that we would invade, then
he'd provide a little access. He could have, at any time, said what he did
with all of the missing WMD material that Blix thought that he had.
So I take it you condone breaking the law?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 12:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: CBC News: Bush rushed into Iraq invasion: Clinton
Not complying with the requirements of the UN is a technical foul, but
not the same as having WMD.
-Kevin
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:22:04 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yes, it makes sense that HE would say it, but what he says does not make
any
> sense on its own merits. Especially since Blix said that they
specifically
> were not complying with the requirements as stated by the United Nations.
>
> Andy
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
