Morton and Kennison were serviceable, thats a perfect word to describe them. They also had way too many dropped balls, or misrun routes, or missed blocks, or etc etc. Ideally, you have a wide receiver who commands either a constant double team, or handcuffs the opposing teams' stud cornerback. In KC's case, the person who does that is undeniably their TE.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Won Lee
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 11:27 AM
  Subject: Re: Funny..

  At 11:16 8/9/2004 -0500, you wrote:
  >My boy Tony gets doubled all the time. It's the only way to contain him.
  >He creates a mismatch for both a linebacker and a safety, so they often
  >times put one of each on him.
  >
  >This is partly due, of course, to the fact that we have no other
  >legitimate receiving threats (minus Priest out of the backfield).

  OK.  I don't watch too many KC games so I'm going to defer to you.  But I
  will disagree that KC doesn't have anyone else to throw too.  KC has
  Kennison and Morton.  And while they may be superstars they are serviceable
  - at least in the KC system.  Break down last year's WR production as the
  top 36 WRs.  I choose yardage because of all the stats this is probably the
  most reproducible.  TDs are sometimes a byproduct of the situation and with
  KC tendency to run in the red zone and TG as the primary option if they do
  pass, the WR don't get too many chances to score.  If you do the break down
  Kennsion is barely 2nd-tier WR.  Morton is barely a 3rd-tier WR.   Of
  course with the KC offense you would at least like to see the primary WR
  put up 1100 yards.  The second option should put up at least 800 yards.

  <snip>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to