In the 1960's there was a subgroup like this - the Sons of Freedom
Doukhabours. They basically burned everything they owned, then would
start on their neighbours and any locals who disagreed with their
actions.

Note I said subgroup. Most of the Doukhabours strongly disagreed with
these people.

After a few instances the RCMP went in and shut them down.

As for here, lets see, there is Ruby Ridge, Waco, a recent incident
last year outside of Roanoke Virginia.

In the end the response is typically to suppress these subgroups that
are a physical threat to the culture or society at large.

larry

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:11:36 -0500, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But then what happens when a subculture wants to go against the agreed upon morality? Do you simply deny them? Kick them out?
>
> I agree that moral truths need not originate from a deity.
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Kevin Graeme
>  To: CF-Community
>  Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 1:34 PM
>  Subject: Re: multiculturalism question
>
>  /me raises hand.
>
>  I'm a moral relativist. I don't think that's dangerous. I just think
>  that means any specific government needs to decide what is the agreed
>  upon morality and stick to it for the sake of the society. That's
>  effectively the same as having objective truths, but isn't the copout
>  of saying that somehow they are truths magically imposed by
>  god/universe.
>
>  -Kevin
>
>  <snip>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to