portraits section that has some of this in it, but I'm still trying to
figure out the best way to do that.
This site is starting to make me mad. I haven't really liked anything I've
done thus far, this is only thing I have really liked and it still doesn't
make me happy.
_____
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 2:20 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: FW: New Website, what do you think
ditto. (very good critique kevin)
one more question: where are the soft porn shots? at least other
photog sites have a little porn on them ;)
jk.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:09:27 -0500, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Preface: This criticism isn't personal, just cutting to the chase to
> get to the things I think could use improvement.
>
> The home page seems poorly balanced. It's particularly odd on a large
> screen, but even when I resize down to the content it still feels like
> the space is poorly arranged. The interior layout is okay, but I'd
> consider not craming it up against the edge. I'd probably let if float
> horizontally in the center of the space.
>
> I'm not a big fan of the typeface. You could keep it for the "McClure
> Photography" wordmark, but I would choose something else for the other
> type.
>
> I notice that the three pictures at the top of each page are randomly
> selected. IMO, if you care about your portfolio, you will care about
> how the pictures are selected and displayed. They aren't just three
> separate photos. They create a visual tryptic and create tenion or
> harmony as a group Quite often I would get pictures that just didn't
> work together. Whether it was something like [B/W | B/W | Color] or
> [Wideshot | Closeup | Closeup] or two pictures that were obviously
> from the same event and one from another or photos with too even or
> too conflicting of tonality.
>
> And of course, I have to add the obligatory jab about using sliced
> table layout instead of being one of the cool kids and using CSS
> positioning. ;-)
>
> -Kevin
>
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:52:02 -0400, Nick McClure
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://mcclure.king-nacho.com <http://mcclure.king-nacho.com/>
> >
> > So I have been working a new website for my photography stuff, what do
you
> > guys think? Still need to add content but I wanted to get an idea about
what
> > others thought about the design and how it seems to flow.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > --
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
