>From the right's perspective, both the Washington Post and New York Times are
to the left of center. So the right finds this whole mea culpa thing in some
way silly. They may also find it just another attempt to smear Bush: Good
gone bad because of bad info combined with pressure tactics by Bush Admin.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 2:08 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Washinton Post issues mea culpa for prewar coverage
The Post is a very liberal paper? What are you smoking?
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:05:14 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I read it and it a very Liberal paper claiming
> that they were protecting Bush. Stupidist thing I
> heard in a long time.
>
> -sm
>
> --- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Did you read the article? They are basically saying
> > that they should have been more balanced (fair and
> > balanced?) in their pre-war reporting. They are
> > also one among many news organizations that are now
> > saying the same thing.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Sam Morris
> > To: CF-Community
> > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 2:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: Washinton Post issues mea culpa for
> > prewar coverage
> >
> >
> > What a coincidence. I knew back then there were no
> > WMDs but didn't tell anyone.
> >
> > I also know who's going to win the most gold
> > medals
> > but I'm not going to tell you until it's over.
> >
> > Why would anyone read that right-wing rag anyway?
> >
> > -sm
> >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
