"I knew back then there were no WMDs but didn't tell anyone."
The article's point was that they did publish the articles, however they
made deep, internal pages. This effectively made them less attention-worthy
than front page articles which generally reported the administration's POV.
Now whether that requires an "apology" or not I wouldn't say. However
obviously they feel, upon review, that they had let their readers down. I'm
all for organizations (of any stripe) accepting responsibility for their
actions.
Jim Davis
_____
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 3:05 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Washinton Post issues mea culpa for prewar coverage
Yes I read it and it a very Liberal paper claiming
that they were protecting Bush. Stupidist thing I
heard in a long time.
-sm
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
