done here but you need to throw a few more punches.
Whatever.
First of all I don't know what kind of friendly
conversations you have were you'd say to someone you
don't know that his words make no sense. Then when
that person explains to you what they mean you attack
their use of the specific words.
You were the aggressor and if you meant it in a
friendly way you could have used more tack. You keep
calling me passive-aggressive yet I feel that term
applies to you and not me.
I did explain to you that someone recently said I had
poor reading comprehension and you seemed to imply the
same in what seemed an aggressive manner. Sorry if I
misread you and got snippy but you came back and
attacked my use of a phrase so I assumed you were
aggressive all along.
>You ascribe hidden, unspoken agendas
>to those you're discussing things with and deal with
them based on those
>ascriptions.
That's not so. I was very clear when I criticized your
reading comprehension and stated you were being
childish.
As for my hidden agenda, that must be your paranoia.
Everyone here knows I defend Bush and the war in Iraq.
Nothing hidden about it.
Now I'm done with this and hope you are too.
I'll give you the last word/attack.
-sm
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
