Remember that it was his second tour of duty. He did not have to go to
Vietnam, he volunteered.

larry

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:38:26 -0500, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All this uproar over military record....here is what i've gathered so far:
>
> 1) Kerry spent 4 months of his life in a foreign country, getting shot at
> 2) Kerry was responsible for the lives of several men during that time, all of whom are HUGE supporters of his
> 3) Kerry performed so well under these circumstances, he was given several prestigious awards
> 4) After the war, he became a harsh critic of not only the war, but the soldiers fighting it
>
> I just simply cannot see any possible way that you could attack the man's service. Period. You just CANT!
>
> Now, his behavior upon his return to the US is most certainly up for debate and scrutiny. But the right wingers trying to mar his actual service to the country are really, really starting to piss me off.
>
> Brian
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Larry C. Lyons
>  To: CF-Community
>  Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:32 AM
>  Subject: FW: Naval Records dispute claims by anti Kerry Vets
>
>  From this morning's Washington Post
>
>  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13267-2004Aug18.html
>
>  Records Counter a Critic of Kerry
>  Fellow Skipper's Citation Refers To Enemy Fire
>
>  By Michael Dobbs
>  Washington Post Staff Writer
>  Thursday, August 19, 2004; Page A01
>
>  <snip>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to