In this case I'd like to see the phyics behind it and tested by some
reputable 3rd party, like the consumer federation etc. Just because
they're covered on TV doesn't mean a lot. For instance it came to
light recently that one Florida TV station was accepting fees to
feature products or people on their morning show.

larry

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:22:55 -0400, Matthew Small
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>    You should have investigated the website a little more... there were all kinds of videos from TV stations that had tested it out and proclaimed it to work.  My wife said that she saw a piece by CNN on the other day and wanted to buy it.  I know there are a lot fo scams on the internet, but some of them aren't scams.
>
> - Matt Small
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Larry C. Lyons
>  To: CF-Community
>  Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 10:21 PM
>  Subject: Re: photo-blocker
>
>  there's another born every minute.
>
>  any proof that it works?
>
>  I've got better things to spend my money on.
>
>  larry
>
>  On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:57:41 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > This has to be one of the best ideas I've ever seen.
>  >
>  > http://www.phantomplate.com
>  >
>  > Privacy 1
>  > Thought Police 0
>  >
>  > s. isaac dealey     954.927.5117
>  > new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
>  >
>  > add features without fixtures with
>  > the onTap open source framework
>  >
>  > http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
>  > http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
>  > http://www.fusiontap.com
>  >
>  >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to