Personally I think that should be an either or, not an -and-
situation... in other words -- either 1) incapacitate them with gas or
2) storm them and show them no mercy, not 1) incapacitate them with
gas and 2) storm and kill them while they're defenseless.

Though you know, if I were in charge of a situation like that, and I
had enough gas to safely put everyone to sleep I probably would. You
still need to send the troops in ready for resistance just in case
they had gas masks, but killing people when you know they're out-cold
because you made sure they would be unconscious is wrong imo.

> Oh...
> well that's not something I commented on.

> But going back to that attack on the Theatre,
> If those were the men that took the theatre hostage, then
> they were
> terrorists.
> If they were not the right people, they were not
> terrorists.

> An order was obviously given to show no mercy and give no
> quarter to the
> terrorists, therefore I presume if everyone in the theatre
> is passed out
> , the soldiers shot the people that were dressed as
> terrorists and
> armed. Now of course, some terrorists *could* have quickly
> changed
> clothes with civilians and armed the civilians just before
> succumbing to
> the effects of the gas which caught everyone by surprise.

> Your mileage may vary.

> -Gel

s. isaac dealey     954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework

http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to