Palestinian suicide bombers, not those involved in 9/11.
larry
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:23:31 -0600, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is? I have been accepting it as fact. If it isn't true where did it
> come from? I thought they were paying $1000 or something to the
> families of suicide bombers?
>
> Dana
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:43:39 -0500
> Subject: RE: The Republican Fear Machine is at it again
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> It is not, but his statement wasn't connected to 9/11 either. Just a straight
> statement of fact that was incorrect.
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 6:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The Republican Fear Machine is at it again
>
> granted but this is connected to 9/11 how exactly? It's like the
> British saying gee, there are problems in the Shankhill district, so
> let's invade Holland.
>
> Dana
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:45:20 -0500
> Subject: RE: The Republican Fear Machine is at it again
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Gruss,
> While you can argue about Iraq's interaction with Al Q., your statement
> below
> is false. It is a well known fact that they were funding suicide bombers in
> Israel.
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Iraq, on the other hand, had nothing to do with terrorism so we *can*
> make the "zero to thousands"
> argument.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
