If your cause is the correct one, then terrorism should not be necessary to achieve your goals. To that end, i believe a US revolution would of occurred without said acts of terrorism, whereas an "Iraqi insurgency" would all but cease to exist without these acts.
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Definition of terrorism(WAS The politicization of the Iraq War
At the same time however, the so called patiots saw nothing wrong with
burning the homes of loyalists and effectively running ethnic
cleansing campaign against them. For instance one North Carolina
county make any loyalist resident liable for any robberies, thefts etc
that occured in the county. And George Washington praised the county
for doing so.
larry
<snip>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
