Very true. I'm very conservative and I just shake my head when I hear him talk. He's one of those where his agenda drives his principles. Remember the debates? "Sen. Hatch, how would you solve the issues surrounding the issues of Social Security Solvency?"
"Well, if every American would send one dollar to my campaign I could solve it for you. Just go to www.orrinhatch.com and contribute a dollar to my campaign." I mean stuff like that. He's a few tacos short of a combo plate. Respectfully, Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Howie Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:31 AM Subject: Re: evidence > Nobody ever accused Orin Hatch of being overly bright.... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:19 PM > Subject: Re: evidence > > > > That's a good point. Just one thing to clarify. I was in Military > > Intelligence and the government makes a concerted effort to disclose > > information without revealing the means by which we got it. Sen. Hatch > > really screwed the pooch on that one when he specified that we had > > intercepted communications. If he simply said, we have knowledge of > > something without revealing its source, he would have been, technically, ok. > > I agree with you though that we divulge way too much information. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Michael > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Garza, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:06 AM > > Subject: RE: evidence > > > > > > > They already have disclosed this information to NATO allies. One thing to > > > understand is that disclosure of this information publicly would in all > > > likelihood compromise our intelligence gathering efforts which will be > > > increasingly critical to thwarting further attacks. > > > > > > http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/10/04/ret.nato.support/ > > > > > > Jeff > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Mark Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:47 AM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: evidence > > > > > > > > > My personal opinion is that P Bush should disclose evidence against bin > > > laden before any military attack on afganistan is made. > > > > > > Not that i'm pro bin laden, but the continued persistance to made the > > > evidence public, increases public perception (especially in foreign > > > countries) that the US are making him a scapegoat simply because they need > > > one. > > > > > > Acting without full disclosure will also rally countries who already > > harbour > > > anti american sentiments > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > Mark Smyth > > > Developer > > > SUeBS > > > 00 44 1865 880800 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > www.systemsunion.net > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
