See in line....
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Kevin Graeme

   > I am not sure what is more "disgusting" --  DNC smear tactics like this
or the
  > continued rant by the DNC that the RNC is running an attack campaign.

  They are. Both sides are. But I linked early an independent survey of
  the political advertising that showed the Republicans are running
  significantly more attack ads. It's about 60/40.

  Yup, both are equally bad.  No difference.  Count is meaningless.

  > Just another sign that Kerry is starting to flop.  First the real "mean"
side
  > of Kerry came out with the continued discussions of Mary Cheney, then the

  That's the Republicans making a big deal out of a non-issue, which
  appears to be working.

  Yup.  Character for DNC appears to be a non-issue.

   But then I think you have called Clinton's
  nookie in the white house as worse than Bush lying in order to invade
  an entire country and send over 1000 of our service people to their
  deaths.

  Nice flexible interpretation of text.  Do you work for the campaign?  I do
not think that Bush lied.

  > lying side - stem cell research will cure paralysis in within his first 4
  > terms(Kerry in 1 or more of the debates) as well as Alzheimer's (Edwards
last

  > week).   And the democrats accuse Bush of lying.  Amazing.

  Please provide the facts that you speak of.  I've only seen interpretation.
But if you've got the goods, hand'em over and I will join you in the
condemnation.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to