That was running on ix86 right? Wish they would have tested it on 64 bit to see how much better it did perform.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:31:42 -0400, Angel Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/5xnqs > > "Macromedia ColdFusion MX is a rapid application development language that started > off under a company named Allaire. It was > originally developed in C++ and then interpreted into HTML by the ColdFusion runtime > service. Today, ColdFusion runs on top of a > J2EE server, and is compiled into Java byte code, which is then executed in the J2EE > server's Java Virtual Machine (JVM). ColdFusion > MX 6.1 was the version that we used, with the August 2004 updater applied. We left > ColdFusion configured with 8 simultaneous > requests, we enabled trusted cache, and we set the JVM to 512MB for minimum and > maximum heap size as recommended in the Macromedia > performance documentation. > > The difference between the Opteron and Xeon here was approximately 3%, which isn't > far off our deviation of 2.5%. The JVM isn't > optimized for either CPU architecture, so the test is completely impacted by the > hardware itself. The results here indicate that > either CPU platform would result in very similar performance on the ColdFusion MX > 6.1 application server." > > -Gel > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes by Ben Forta http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:132063 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
