90%? Lies? What lies? What books? Proven where? And erm... of course those claims have been disputed. I am disputing them right now! My local radio station runs a disclaimer after them saying they are obliged to accept political advertising.
And I sincerely doubt that the New York TImes reviewed any book -- what book are we talking about by the way? -- without quoting from it. You've been getting your news from Rush again, I can tell :) Dana On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:51:40 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Libel? > > 90% of the 527's spread lies for the Dems. Add what > about all the books that came out that were proven to > be lies? > So you accuse the Swifties of libel but their claims > haven't been disputed. When the NY Times finally > reviewed the book they claimed it was all lies but > couldn't give one example. > > --- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > as opposed of course to out and out libel by our 527 > > pals the swift > > boat veterans :) Waa waa waa I say :) > > > > Dana > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes by Ben Forta http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:132127 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
