Well it's not slander if the person settles out of court - then it' true. While I'd overall agree with you, I think in this case it worked, but I could be convinced otherwise.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:34:46 +1000, Jon Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Didn't he say that he would be happy to have the tapes public as there > was nothing to hide? > > I must say, the American legal system sucks a big one. The fact you > can publicly slander someone (rightly or wrongly), threaten with a > massive public lawsuit then recieve payola to keep your mouth shut and > sign an NDA is disturbing. > > Has what this lady alleged not a criminal offense? Would the police > not be required to investigate her claims? Why take it to the media > first and not the police? > > What ever happened to Kobe Bryant? Was he cleared? Was this just > another money grabbing stunt? > > The sad thing is, Australia is slowly but surely heading this way as well. :( > > Or am I just an out of touch outsider... > > > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:54:58 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just heard that all claims have been withdrawn and that Mr. O'Reilly > > has settled. You can bet that before they did that they wanted to > > hear some of the tapes which must exist. Whatever he said must no be > > good. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's not only good for you, it's good for everybody. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=39 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:133294 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
