We had a major terrorist attack and a small scale invasion of Afghanistan to iradicate terrorists both which served as justified reasons for increased spending. Bush then opted to spend unforseen billions of dollars and thousands of lives unjustifiably invading Iraq. That was a leadership decision and a leadership problem.
>To me it stands to reason that Bush would be one of the biggest spenders, if >for no other reason than because things cost more now, the next guy almost >always going to spend as much as the last guy, of course we should remember >that it does take congress to spend money. Oh and we had a major terrorist >attack, and two wars. Those things kinda skew the average. Confidentiality Notice: This message including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete any copies of this message. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:134099 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
