Right, but you said, "separation of church and state. Therefore - the sale is legal and should not be refused."
This is the comment I was referring to - that it would be illegal to sell X based on religion. That's how I read your comment (and if I'm wrong, let me know). On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:59:22 -0500, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't say that - the original posting was, I believe, a pharmacist that > refused to sell something that was in stock. > > --- On Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1:55 PM, Raymond Camden scribed: --- > > > > > > The state has the right to tell you that you can't sell to a person > > based on gender/race. The state does not have the right to tell you > > that must sell X. Would a Muslim store owner have to sell pork? > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:46:38 -0500, Howie Hamlin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What I'm saying is that the sale of those pills is legal because you > >> can't legislate based on religious beliefs. This is because of > >> separation of church and state. Therefore - the sale is legal and > >> should not be refused. > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135263 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
