>If I remember correctly, there is a Supreme Court case protecting porn >under the First Amendment. It may be unpopular speech, but it is >protected.
I thought it was the reverse: that "obscenity" was specifically catagorized as unprotected speech. I can't remember, but I believe this also had to do with court cases brought by the FCC who were allowed to continue levying fines on "obscene" material because it was not protected speech. Or so I remember. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:137435 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
