I see. Well, call me crazy, but I think if a country wants to keep their people from recieving cookies from the rest of the world, then, I figure the burden should be on the government of that country to do the blocking .. not the company/country that provides the material that they find in offense. The EU wants to block cookies, fine .. let them block them. It's not the rest of the world's responsibility to do it for them (keep these comments in the context of the cookies, people .. not other things =-p ).
Anyone from the potentially affected areas care to voice their opinion(s)? Todd > Remember this from early last year? > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world/DailyNews/yahoo000412.html > > and this from January 2001? > > http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2677090,00.html?chkpt=zdnnstop > > Not criminal certainly, but also not a big step to make it so. Could this > case be used as a precedent for lawsuits against companies using *evil* > cookies? > > my $0.02 > > will ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
