But bullets are cheap. Really cheap. We wouldn't have to spend $25 billion, since we would only need one bullet per person. And the idea to charge the family for the bullet is fiscally sound.
(I was completely kidding. It just seemed that everyone was on the "love em don't jail em" side of the fence, so I thought I'd add some balance.) Jerry Jerry Johnson Web Developer Dolan Media Company >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/06/04 02:01PM >>> You'd have shot several Presidents, prominent businessmen, the majority of the upper class. It won't be blue collar workers getting shot. Your Actors will also mostly be dead. Clean up the wealthy in Hollywood in a firing line why don�t ya. Probably would have shot several active members of this list too. At the very least it would be an interesting test against those countries that have gone the alternate route toward reducing penalties for small amounts for personal use, or allowing personal use as in Amsterdam. Why not talk about these other models, that haven't cost anywhere near 25 Billion. Don't you see that the War on Drugs is a government money making exercise? Do you know the easiest way for any federal department to get funding, is to somehow label that funding as part of the fight against drugs? Of course now this may be eclipsed by saying the funds are needed to fight Terrorism. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:138871 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
