I agree with you. I don't think screeners should be federal employees.
Let a private firm and the airlines figure that out. But the government
should have an overwatch committee that, as you said, fines the private
firm and/or airlines when the people aren't doing their jobs. Better
yet, start firing people. I just don't think that just because someone
is a federal employee means that they'll do a better job. In a lot of
cases, it's just the oposite.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Lon Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:50 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: just when you think you've heard it all ...


  I'm not a fan of nationalization, of anything. However, I wouldn't 
have a problem with the feds setting training and operation standards. 
If you want to mandate an FAA approved training course, that would be 
okay. And then set federal guidelines on how they operate. And then fine

the crud out of them when they fail to do their jobs.


-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:36 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: just when you think you've heard it all ...


And of course the house of representatives voted yesterday to a new 
airport
security bill that still have these companies that currently do airport
security continue their incompetence.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to