um and he knew she would be missing before she was missing. That's the big one.
Dana On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:44:17 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Angel wrote: > > Sounds to me like Peterson needed a better legal defence team > > and he'd be a free man today. > > That's my thought. If I understand here's the evidence against him: > > 1.) He was cheating on Mrs. Peterson. > 2.) He didn't seem overly disturbed that she was missing. > 3.) He went fishing in the same place as her body turned up. > > For me, there's plenty of reasonable doubt there. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta http://www.newatlanta.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139975 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
