wow, has anyone read The Stranger? Actually, I think he is guilty and it was the taped conversations with Amber that did it for me. He told her he had "lost" his wife while Laci was still unsuspectingly getting ready for Christmas. All well and good and married men *have* been known to lie to their girlfriends. Except that a few days later, he *does* "lose" Laci. Also, the stuff about not wanting his own children although he was very willing to play and be with Amber's little girl is pretty damning. He was adamant about it on those tapes. I think the difference between Amber's little girl and Laci's little boy was that he would have owed child support for Conor. That's a pretty sleazy motive for murder.
However, I find it pretty amazing that the physical evidence amounts to one hair. Either he's a very careful bastard, or they screwed up. Dana On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:20:24 -0500, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WOW then you get this. > > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/14/peterson.case/index.html > > Jurors who decided that Scott Peterson deserves to die say his lack of > emotion played a large role in their decision. > Maybe he was sitting stone faced because standing up and screaming i > didnt do it wouldn't help him any? heh > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:53:45 -0400, Angel Stewart > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And Vice Versa. > > > > Hmm..that's strange though don't you think? > > A case with this much media coverage, > > and we don't really know WHAT they convicted him on do we? > > > > -Gel > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: G > > > > And you didn't see 1% of what the jury saw. > > > > Your vindication of him is based on media reports, while their indicment of > > him is based on arduous deliberation of the facts. I > > simply don't see how you can be so sure that you are right, and they are > > wrong. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139782 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:44:12 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:44:12 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:44:12 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEqS-0004L9-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:44:12 -0800 Received: from source ([64.105.139.2]) by exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:46:51 PST Received: from cox-internet.com by lists.letterrip.com with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 06:33:56 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Stefanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 5000 Error Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:33:50 -0600 To: "LetterRip Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Reply-To: "LetterRip Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Precedence: List List-Software: LetterRip Pro 4.05b10 by LetterRip Software, LLC. List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-LR-SENT-TO: [email protected] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 On Dec 13, 2004, at 7:59 AM, Eric Stefanski wrote: > On Dec 3, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Jud Spencer wrote: > >> I am guessing that some other folder in your Letterrip files folder >> hierarchy has the wrong privileges. Given the timing, very likely one >> of the >> bounce digest folders. > > Thanks to reading the info on the ls command, I discovered that I > could display the information for all the files in all the > subdirectories at once (ls -Rla). (With over 125 lists, I was somewhat > disinclined to do this manually...) It turned out that three of the > bounce digests had root as the owner. I fixed that, and we were error > and crash free at 00:59 this morning. But, at 00:59 this morning, there started a "file could not be found" error dialogue... * * * * * * * * An Approach to Liturgical Style - 27 of 28 * * * * * * * * What a man is, rather than what he knows, will at last determine his style. Style *is* the writer. By (W)hom must our rite be written? The Rev. Eric J. Stefanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confess And Teach For Unity http://www.CAT41.org Lists: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Holy Trinity Ev.-Luth. Church, Harrison, AR http://www.HolyTrinityLC.com * * * * * Adapted from Strunk & White, ~The Elements of Style~ * * * * * -- This message is from the Letterrip-Talk Mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/letterrip-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/ From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:44:16 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:44:16 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:44:16 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx120.postini.com ([64.18.0.34] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEqW-0004LJ-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:44:16 -0800 Received: from source ([64.118.64.245]) by exprod5mx120.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:46:52 PST Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOST with ESMTP id A4EC0423648378419BDDAFA62A57CF36 Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:48:27 -0500 Subject: Re: death for scott peterson From: Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:45:33 -0700 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:50.53114/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.64 wow, has anyone read The Stranger? Actually, I think he is guilty and it was the taped conversations with Amber that did it for me. He told her he had "lost" his wife while Laci was still unsuspectingly getting ready for Christmas. All well and good and married men *have* been known to lie to their girlfriends. Except that a few days later, he *does* "lose" Laci. Also, the stuff about not wanting his own children although he was very willing to play and be with Amber's little girl is pretty damning. He was adamant about it on those tapes. I think the difference between Amber's little girl and Laci's little boy was that he would have owed child support for Conor. That's a pretty sleazy motive for murder. However, I find it pretty amazing that the physical evidence amounts to one hair. Either he's a very careful bastard, or they screwed up. Dana On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:20:24 -0500, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WOW then you get this. > > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/14/peterson.case/index.html > > Jurors who decided that Scott Peterson deserves to die say his lack of > emotion played a large role in their decision. > Maybe he was sitting stone faced because standing up and screaming i > didnt do it wouldn't help him any? heh > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:53:45 -0400, Angel Stewart > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And Vice Versa. > > > > Hmm..that's strange though don't you think? > > A case with this much media coverage, > > and we don't really know WHAT they convicted him on do we? > > > > -Gel > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: G > > > > And you didn't see 1% of what the jury saw. > > > > Your vindication of him is based on media reports, while their indicment of > > him is based on arduous deliberation of the facts. I > > simply don't see how you can be so sure that you are right, and they are > > wrong. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139782 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:47:28 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:47:28 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:47:28 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx126.postini.com ([64.18.0.40] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEtc-0004Lv-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:47:28 -0800 Received: from source ([130.57.169.17]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx126.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:50:07 EST Received: from headcheese.ximian.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ximian.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28FF124C4D; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:18:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.ximian.com (Postfix, from userid 38) id 6A7A1124C38; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:16:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from skeptopotamus.ximian.com (skeptopotamus.ximian.com [130.57.169.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "mail.cam.novell.com", Issuer "Equifax" (not verified)) by lists.ximian.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDFC124C8F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:16:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by skeptopotamus.ximian.com (Postfix) id 5DA6663FCE; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:16:55 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lyle.provo.novell.com (lyle.provo.novell.com [137.65.81.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "imap.novell.com", Issuer "SERVICES2" (not verified)) by skeptopotamus.ximian.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B0263FC9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:16:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([137.65.81.216]) by lyle.provo.novell.com; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:16:51 -0700 From: JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Novell, Inc. Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Evolution-hackers] Translating Welcome Message Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: People writing code for Evolution <evolution-hackers.lists.ximian.com> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution-hackers/> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:16:45 -0500 X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 Looking at: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6066 I think we haven't really let the translators know what to do here. evolution/mail/default/C/ contains the default inbox for new installs. Other locales can be added here, much like documentation. Sorry for the miscommunication. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:47:29 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:47:29 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:47:29 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx54.postini.com ([64.18.0.233] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEtd-0004M2-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:47:29 -0800 Received: from source ([63.251.223.186]) by exprod5mx54.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:50:07 PST Received: (qmail 9831 invoked by uid 514); 14 Dec 2004 15:43:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 9822 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 15:43:25 -0000 Received: from x1.develooper.com (63.251.223.170) by lists.develooper.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2004 15:43:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 28923 invoked by uid 225); 14 Dec 2004 15:43:25 -0000 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 28907 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2004 15:43:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: la.mx.develooper.com Received-SPF: pass (x1.develooper.com: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 63.251.223.176 as permitted sender) Received: from la.mx.develooper.com (HELO x1.develooper.com) (63.251.223.176) by la.mx.develooper.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:43:20 -0800 Received: (qmail 28811 invoked by uid 421); 14 Dec 2004 15:43:15 -0000 Date: 14 Dec 2004 15:43:15 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Stephen Adkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: p5ee/App-Repository/t DBI-select.t X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 cvsuser 04/12/14 07:43:15 Modified: App-Repository/t DBI-select.t Log: reconnect on error in _get_rows() and _get_row() Revision Changes Path 1.7 +140 -2 p5ee/App-Repository/t/DBI-select.t Index: DBI-select.t =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/public/p5ee/App-Repository/t/DBI-select.t,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- DBI-select.t 2 Sep 2004 20:59:16 -0000 1.6 +++ DBI-select.t 14 Dec 2004 15:43:15 -0000 1.7 @@ -463,6 +463,60 @@ &check_select($sql,0); ########################################################################### +# EXCEPTIONS +########################################################################### + +{ + my ($rows, $row); + open(SAVE, ">&STDERR"); + open(STDERR, "/dev/null"); + + $rows = []; + eval { + $rows = $rep->get_rows("table_y", {}, ["x"]); + }; + ok($@ =~ /fail/, "get_rows(): bad SQL causes exception"); + + $rows = []; + eval { + $rows = $rep->get_row("table_y", {}, ["x"]); + }; + ok($@ =~ /fail/, "get_row(): bad SQL causes exception"); + + $rep->insert("test_person",["person_id","last_name","first_name"],[1,"Stephen","Adkins"]); + + $rep->_disconnect(); + $rows = []; + eval { + $rows = $rep->get_rows("test_person", {}, ["person_id"]); + }; + ok($#$rows == 0, "get_rows(): reconnect because rep was _disconnect()ed"); + + $rep->{dbh}{mysql_auto_reconnect} = 0; + $rep->{dbh}->disconnect(); + $rows = []; + eval { + $rows = $rep->get_rows("test_person", {}, ["person_id"]); + }; + ok($#$rows == 0, "get_rows(): reconnect because dbh was disconnect()ed"); + + $rep->{dbh}{mysql_auto_reconnect} = 0; + $rep->{dbh}->disconnect(); + $row = undef; + eval { + $row = $rep->get_row("test_person", {person_id => 1}, ["person_id"]); + }; + ok(defined $row && $#$row == 0, "get_row(): reconnect because dbh was disconnect()ed"); + + open(STDERR, ">&SAVE"); + close(SAVE); + + $rep->delete("test_person",{person_id => 1}); +} + +exit(0); + +########################################################################### # JOINED (MULTI-TABLE) SELECT SQL-GENERATION TESTS ########################################################################### @@ -474,8 +528,92 @@ EOF #$App::trace_subs = 1; &test_get_rows($expect_sql,0,"_mk_select_joined_sql(): 1 col, no params","test_person",{},"age"); + exit(0); +$expect_sql = <<EOF; +select + t1.first_name, + t1.state, + t1.age +from test_person +where (age in (14,15) or age > 18 or age is null) +EOF +&test_get_rows($expect_sql, 0, "_mk_select_joined_sql(): OR conditions with [] value", + "test_person", + {age => [14, 15, ">18", undef]}, + ["first_name","state","age"]); +$sql = $rep->_mk_select_sql("test_person", + {age => [14,15,">18",undef]}, + ["first_name","state","age"]); +is($sql, $expect_sql, "_mk_select_sql(): OR conditions with [] value"); +&check_select($sql,0); + +$expect_sql = <<EOF; +select + t1.first_name, + t1.state, + t1.age +from test_person +where age > 14 + and first_name like '%A%' +EOF +&test_get_rows($expect_sql, 0, "_mk_select_joined_sql(): square bracket [] params", + "test_person", + [age => ">14", first_name => "*A*"], + ["first_name","state","age"]); +$sql = $rep->_mk_select_sql("test_person", + [age => ">14", first_name => "*A*"], + ["first_name","state","age"]); +is($sql, $expect_sql, "_mk_select_sql(): square bracket [] params"); +&check_select($sql,0); + +$expect_sql = <<EOF; +select + t1.first_name, + t1.state, + t1.age +from test_person +where age > 14 + or not (first_name like '%A%') + or (state in ('GA','CA') and + age <= 2) +EOF +&test_get_rows($expect_sql, 0, "_mk_select_joined_sql(): ordercols, directions", + "test_person", + ["_or", age => ">14", + ["_not", first_name => "*A*"], + ["_and", state => "GA,CA", "age.le" => 2]], + ["first_name","state","age"]); +$sql = $rep->_mk_select_sql("test_person", + [age => ">14", first_name => "*A*"], + ["first_name","state","age"]); +is($sql, $expect_sql, "_mk_select_sql(): verbatim"); +&check_select($sql,0); + +$expect_sql = <<EOF; +select + t1.first_name, + t1.state, + t1.age +from test_person +where not (not(age > 14) + and not (first_name like '%A%') + and not (state in ('GA','CA') and + age <= 2)) +EOF +&test_get_rows($expect_sql, 0, "_mk_select_joined_sql(): ordercols, directions", + "test_person", + ["_not", age => ">14", + ["_not_or", first_name => "*A*"], + ["_not_and", state => ["GA","CA"], "age.le" => 2]], + ["first_name","state","age"]); +$sql = $rep->_mk_select_sql("test_person", + [age => ">14", first_name => "*A*"], + ["first_name","state","age"]); +is($sql, $expect_sql, "_mk_select_sql(): verbatim"); +&check_select($sql,0); + &test_get_rows($expect_sql,0,"_mk_select_joined_sql(): 1 col as array, no params","test_person",{},["age"]); $expect_sql = <<EOF; @@ -804,14 +942,14 @@ from test_person where age in (14,15,16,17,18) EOF -&test_get_rows($expect_sql, 0, "_mk_select_joined_sql(): ordercols, directions", +&test_get_rows($expect_sql, 0, "_mk_select_joined_sql(): verbatim (boo. hiss. evil.)", "test_person", {"age.verbatim" => "age in (14,15,16,17,18)"}, ["first_name","last_name","city","state","age"]); $sql = $rep->_mk_select_sql("test_person", {"age.verbatim" => "age in (14,15,16,17,18)"}, ["first_name","last_name","city","state","age"]); -is($sql, $expect_sql, "_mk_select_sql(): verbatim"); +is($sql, $expect_sql, "_mk_select_sql(): verbatim (boo. hiss. evil.)"); &check_select($sql,0); exit 0; From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:47:28 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:47:28 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:47:28 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEtb-0004Lr-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:47:27 -0800 Received: from source ([146.82.138.6]) by exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:50:07 EST Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id D64532EA9E; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:50:06 -0600 (CST) Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sockmel.bononia.it (sockmel.bononia.it [194.242.226.39]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6BE2EC1D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:50:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from fistandantilus.takhisis.org (sockmel.bononia.it [194.242.226.39]) by sockmel.bononia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870AE5723B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:49:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by fistandantilus.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id 799563FC1C3; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:48:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:48:34 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFS : most of my packages Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Rc-Virus: 2004-10-30_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2004-08-29_01 Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/6931 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Id: <debian-ocaml-maint.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:50:06 -0600 (CST) X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0150) gt3 GT2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] Resent-Bcc: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:11:58PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > - ocamlgraph (update) Did this one. > > > - ocaml-fileutils (update) > > > - ocamlgsl (update) > > > - ocamldap (update) 3 TODO. Cheers. --=20 Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBvwtR1cqbBPLEI7wRAuBBAJ9IjfmHTcGgYoZhVcfzCEcPXW3HcwCcCPeL MD5KlmBoAx18ZUE293iSrmU= =PLwI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:19 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:19 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:19 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx124.postini.com ([64.18.0.38] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEvP-0004OV-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:19 -0800 Received: from source ([64.118.64.245]) by exprod5mx124.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:51:56 EST Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOST with ESMTP id 6FBCCCFB8CCBB14998B8C27F04D19F00 Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:30 -0500 Subject: RE: EarthSea? From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:51:31 -0400 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:95.97421/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 It's not silly at all. They took the author's vision and warped it so that it would be more acceptable to a prime time american audience. More female roles, altering or removing non-whites characters...I missed it and I'll probably watch it when it re-runs, but I wish I hadn't known all that since I'll now be viewing it with a more critical eye. ;-) I totally enjoyed the remake of Dune and Children of Dune though, so I think they can do good stuff. I did not read the Dune or Children of dune books before watching the movie however, but I thought they were both great series in their own right. -Gel -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis He definitely is in the book - quite clearly. Gontish men are dark ("copper brown") - it was the Kargs that were light skinned, blond and barbaric (think Vikings). This was always important to the Author who strove to paint the civilized, inner island folk as dark (earthy) skinned and the barbarians as light. I know it's silly to get hung up on it, but it was always such a nice, subtle touch. In the book both Ged and Ogion are Gontishmen - from the same island. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139762 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:22 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:22 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:22 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx117.postini.com ([64.18.0.89] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEvS-0004Oz-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:22 -0800 Received: from source ([207.173.200.128]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx117.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:52:01 PST Received: from postgresql.org (svr1.postgresql.org [200.46.204.71]) by commandprompt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iBEFprla032483 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:52:00 -0800 X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF0A3A6C7E for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:51:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29463-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:51:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.libertyrms.com (unknown [207.219.45.62]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002423A6C54 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:51:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dba5.int.libertyrms.com ([10.1.3.44]) by mail.libertyrms.com with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1CeExe-0006vQ-CG for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:51:38 +0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:51:37 -0500 From: Brad Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] V8.0rc1 On AIX. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 AIX 5.1 I applied Bruce's patch, configured with --enable-thread-safety and everything went smoothly. > ====================== > All 96 tests passed. > ====================== Brad. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:27 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:27 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:27 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx49.postini.com ([64.18.0.216] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEvX-0004PU-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:27 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx49.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:52:06 PST Received: (qmail 53625 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 15:44:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 53446 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 15:44:35 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 217.31.228.29 as permitted sender) Received: from smtp.oksijen.com (HELO squid.oksijen.com) (217.31.228.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:44:28 -0800 Received: from mail.oksijen.com (mail.oksijen.com [192.168.43.5]) by squid.oksijen.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBEFhsS01316 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:43:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: maintaining a database connection pool or a socket connection pool MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: METIN ZAVRAK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:32:19 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on OKSIJEN/OKSIJEN(Release 6.0.3|September 26, 2003) at 14.12.2004 17:32:17, Serialize complete at 14.12.2004 17:32:17 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005665ECC2256F6A_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.64 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 005665ECC2256F6A_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,=20 Is there a way to maintain a database connection pool or a socket=20 connection pool within Axis?=20 I am developing a GUI which is dummy and don't know what to do except how=20 to connect web service.=20 The web service, gets the parameters and connects to a database and runs=20 queries on tables, prepares results and sends the results back to GUI.=20 1 - How could I return resultSet from a web service? (any code sample?) 2 - Could I maintain a connection pool in order to use existing=20 connections? I am using Tomcat as web server and it has its own db=20 connection pool but how can I register resource to JNDI? I have to=20 maintain two different connection pools (one for mysql and one for oracle) = Besides, the GUI sends some some commands to web service.=20 Web service takes the commands and connects to an application over a=20 predefined socket. Get the results from the application and return=20 results.=20 1 - Can I maintain a socket connection pool for this operation?=20 I know web services are stateless but how stateless they are?=20 Thanks =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Metin ZAVRAK Yaz=FDl=FDm Geli=FEtirme M=FChendisi Oksijen Teknoloji=20 0 543 502 03 63 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Verba volent, scripta manent. (S=F6z u=E7ar, yaz=FD kal=FDr). --=_alternative 005665ECC2256F6A_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1254" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Hi, </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Is there a way to maintain a database connection pool or a socket connection pool within Axis? </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">I am developing a GUI which is dummy and don't know what to do except how to connect web service. </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">The web service, gets the parameters and connects to a database and runs queries on tables, prepares results and sends the results back to GUI. </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">1 - How could I return resultS= et from a web service? (any code sample?)</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">2 - Could I maintain a connection po= ol in order to use existing connections? I am using Tomcat as web server and it has its own db connection pool but how can I register resource to JNDI? I have to maintain two different connection pools (one for mysql and one for oracle) </font> <br> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Besides, the GUI sends some some com= mands to web service. </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Web service takes the commands and c= onnects to an application over a predefined socket. Get the results from the applic= ation and return results. </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">1 - Can I maintain a socket connecti= on pool for this operation? </font> <br> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">I know web services are stateless but how stateless they are? </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Thanks</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<br> Metin ZAVRAK<br> Yaz=FDl=FDm Geli=FEtirme M=FChendisi<br> Oksijen Teknoloji <br> <br> 0 543 502 03 63<br> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<br> Verba volent, scripta manent.<br> (S=F6z u=E7ar, yaz=FD kal=FDr).</font> --=_alternative 005665ECC2256F6A_=-- From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:21 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:21 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:21 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx122.postini.com ([64.18.0.36] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEvR-0004Oo-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:21 -0800 Received: from source ([64.118.64.245]) by exprod5mx122.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:51:59 PST Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOST with ESMTP id 6FBCCCFB8CCBB14998B8C27F04D19F00 Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:30 -0500 Subject: RE: EarthSea? From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:51:31 -0400 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:95.97421/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.64 It's not silly at all. They took the author's vision and warped it so that it would be more acceptable to a prime time american audience. More female roles, altering or removing non-whites characters...I missed it and I'll probably watch it when it re-runs, but I wish I hadn't known all that since I'll now be viewing it with a more critical eye. ;-) I totally enjoyed the remake of Dune and Children of Dune though, so I think they can do good stuff. I did not read the Dune or Children of dune books before watching the movie however, but I thought they were both great series in their own right. -Gel -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis He definitely is in the book - quite clearly. Gontish men are dark ("copper brown") - it was the Kargs that were light skinned, blond and barbaric (think Vikings). This was always important to the Author who strove to paint the civilized, inner island folk as dark (earthy) skinned and the barbarians as light. I know it's silly to get hung up on it, but it was always such a nice, subtle touch. In the book both Ged and Ogion are Gontishmen - from the same island. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139762 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:33 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:33 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx126.postini.com ([64.18.0.40] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEvc-0004Pd-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:32 -0800 Received: from source ([207.36.15.228]) by exprod5mx126.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:52:09 EST Received: from www.runrev.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.runrev.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C6F930113; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:47:02 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fjrhome.net (dpmail01.doteasy.com [65.61.209.1]) by mail.runrev.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9896930113 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:46:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.202] [209.158.247.84] by fjrhome.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A46A4770152; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:19:06 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Frank D. Engel, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:13:53 -0500 To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-IMSTrailer: __IMail_7__ Subject: Re: help need to "read from file until xxxx OR yyyy OR zzzz" X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: How to use Revolution <use-revolution.lists.runrev.com> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=no version=2.64 You should be able to read in an entire file of even several hundred megabytes, assuming the rest of the data you have in memory is not too excessively large. Most 32-bit operating systems leave a virtual address space of just under 2GB for each program. In that 2GB you fit your application program, some shared library code, the heap and stack space, etc. -- but there should still be more than 1GB for your data. Even if your computer only has 128MB of RAM, with modern hard drives and virtual memory architecture... I'd figure on being able to handle files of around 200MB on smaller semi-modern systems, maybe as big as 1GB or more on high-end systems, while loading the whole thing into RAM. Note that this may vary somewhat depending on the operating system you target. As far as using RegEx, you could only use it on the portion of the file loaded into memory. You might consider doing that, and realize that if there is no match, then you only have a part of the block in memory, so read some more and try again... On Dec 14, 2004, at 9:46 AM, Randy Padawer wrote: > Thanks for the comments. Well, the problem with reading the whole file > at once is that some of these files can indeed be huge -- several > megabytes. Here's what I'm doing... The text file is made up of many > individual emails concatenated end-to-end. Since the emails may have > originated from different ISP accounts, they may use different > delimeters, i.e., ">From " or "X-Message-Info: " or "Return-Path: <" > or "From [EMAIL PROTECTED]". I have written a simple program that will > separate > the huge file back into individual text files, one for each email. It > works well if the email is from a single account (with its unique > delimeter). However if, say, Apple's mail.app is pulling mail from > multiple accounts, I can't "read from" any of those delimeters. Can I > do the regex routine (something I don't quite yet understand... but > will soon!) on a file I've not wholly read? Thanks again for your > great help. -- Randy > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > > ----------------------------------------------------------- Frank D. Engel, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual $ true | cat /usr/manual | grep "John 3:16" John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. $ ___________________________________________________________ $0 Web Hosting with up to 120MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer 10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more. Signup at www.doteasy.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:22 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:22 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:22 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx119.postini.com ([64.18.0.33] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEvS-0004Ox-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:22 -0800 Received: from source ([64.62.197.83]) by exprod5mx119.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:52:00 EST Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Paul Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: 5.5 SMTP Problem Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:51:12 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-List-Host: swynk.com discussion lists- ls.swynk.com <http://www.swynk.com> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S: 9.59835/99.76186 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 I'll keep it brief and go into detail as need I think. I have a 5.5 SP4 box, fully patched, accepting mail from a perimiter relay box. Today two emails arrived at pretty much the same time, from some company who look to be having some "odd" email issues. The emails arrived with the same sender, subject, and sending system message ID, but different content, and Exchange tracking shows them both as having been transferred to the three recipients mailboxes. Odd thing is, they only have one of them and I have no idea as to why, all the logs right from the perimeter to Exchange say we received two emails. Any pointers would be appreciated. thanks, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:34 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:34 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:34 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx89.postini.com ([64.18.0.77] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEve-0004Ps-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:34 -0800 Received: from source ([209.239.33.40]) by exprod5mx89.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:52:13 EST Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by host24.websitesource.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id iBEFqDTj003268 for [email protected]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:52:13 -0500 Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:49:14 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:49:06 -0500 (EST) From: Fred Widall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stripes on digital image - followup. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (ist.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:49:08 -0500 (EST) X-Miltered: at minos by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr";)! X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/627/Sun Dec 12 14:53:11 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/134736 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 Rob, Let's see. 1) Batteries are the ones supplied with the camera (CR-V3). I'm up to 800+ shots on them but no indication in the display of battery depletion. 2) Memory card is Lexar 1Gb SD. 3) No flash was used. 4) Camera was in AF mode. Does that provide any more clues ?? Thanks. Fred. ==================================== On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 13 Dec 2004 at 23:06, Herb Chong wrote: > > > based on this information, i believe you had an error during transfer of the > > image from the card, or that there is a bad spot on the card. > > Looking at the block diagram of the sensor I suspect it could be due to power > supply modulation to the during read-out of the the problematic rows. > > What type of batteries were in use? Were they near depletion? Was a Microdrive > in use? Was the integrated flash in use? Was the camera AF active? > > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:26 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:26 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:26 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx119.postini.com ([64.18.0.33] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEvW-0004PL-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:26 -0800 Received: from source ([216.40.248.61]) by exprod5mx119.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:52:05 MST Received: from www.alsohosting.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id iBEFpHj14657; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:51:17 -0500 Received: from mxout5.netvision.net.il (mxout5.netvision.net.il [194.90.9.29]) by www.alsohosting.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id iBEFpBj14643 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:51:11 -0500 Received: from q8r7c1 ([212.235.47.93]) by mxout5.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:50:56 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:50:05 +0200 From: Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details, Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1255 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [list] ride to Bar Ilan Univ. X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: list.shemesh.co.il List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.shemesh.co.il/mailman/listinfo/list>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://www.alsohosting.com/pipermail/list> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <http://www.shemesh.co.il/mailman/listinfo/list>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pstn-levels: (S:79.36958/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=ham version=2.64 Seeking a ride to Bar Ilan University on Thursday to arrive any time before 11 AM. Please reply or call my cell 0547 599 498. Thank's. Yohanan Lederman. ---------Hannuka specials for Shemesh list readers! --- SIFREI HAKEREM 19/2 Hativat Harel, Migdal Hamayim Purchase a King's Menorah and receive a 30% discount. Elaborate and simple types of menorahs, Ptil Or set of ready prepared oil lights, olive oil, wicks and cups for oil. 20% discount on these Hannuka items. Selection of gifts for Hannuka for all ages. Open from 10am until 1.30pm, 4.30pm until 8pm Telefax: 999 2636 From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:49:41 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:49:41 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:41 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.0.41] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeEvl-0004Q1-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:49:41 -0800 Received: from source ([192.139.46.139]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:52:13 PST Received: from lists.tcpdump.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.sandelman.ca (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with SMTP id iBEFl6Z19422; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:47:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by lists.sandelman.ca (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBEFkeZ19169 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:46:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F1065414; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:46:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 16170-01-3; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:46:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (dhcp120.icir.org [192.150.187.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84446520C; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:46:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 922BB6710; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:46:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:46:34 -0800 From: Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] support of sctp in filters Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: <tcpdump.workers.lists.tcpdump.org> Precedence: list Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:30:36PM +0100, Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > Hello dear mailing list partcipants, > are there any plans to support > sctp for capture filters? tcpdump -X -i <iface> ip proto sctp Of course, if you mean dumping sctp traffic in a human-readable manner, that is quite different. BMS - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe. From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:58:02 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:58:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:58:02 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx32.postini.com ([64.18.0.187] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeF3q-0004SQ-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:58:02 -0800 Received: from source ([65.119.242.207]) by exprod5mx32.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:00:36 CST Received: from Roo (ROO [65.119.242.5]) by rabbitt.hoot.com (inFusion Mail Server Enterprise v2.7.4) with ESMTP id df87b0ad8361d546b2c9c3cace5c3f84 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:00:28 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Howie Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [iMS] PrismAV Demo Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:00:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_041D_01C4E1CC.1EA62740" X-Priority: X-MSMail-Priority: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Precedence: bulk X-virus-scanned-by: PrismAV X-iMS-RCPT: PGFyY2hpdmVAamFiLm9yZz4NCj== X-LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-LISTMEMBER: [email protected] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.64 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_041D_01C4E1CC.1EA62740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You need two things for virus scanning in demo mode: - Demo or PrismAV for iMS (you already have this) - Demo of PrismAV enabled on the SMTP Server. You will need to contact = sales and ask them to enable this on your license. Then, do a live = update on your server and restart the SMTP service. Regards, Howie ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Lucas Bell=20 To: inFusion Support List=20 Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 12:18 PM Subject: [iMS] PrismAV Demo I have installed the demo for PrismAV on our live iMS server, and it = doesn't seem to be running when mail comes in. Will the demo for = PrismAV actually work with a production/live version of iMS? It seems = like the VSCAN template is never getting ran, even if all I have in = there is a log statement. =3D=3D^=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0D=0AThis list server is Powered by iMS "The Swiss Army Knife= of Mail Servers"=0D=0A-------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------=0D=0AThis list is provided as a free service. = Although we will try to address issues=0D=0Ain a timely manner, support via t= his list is not guaranteed. If you require expedited=0D=0Asupport then a supp= ort contract is required. Support may be purchased from=0D=0Ahttp://www.coolf= usion.com/commerce. Details regarding support options may be reviewed=0D=0Aat= : http://www.coolfusion.com/SupportOptions.cfm=0D=0A--------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------=0D=0ATo leave thi= s list please complete the form at http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/=0D=0ANee= d an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:=0D=0Ahttp://www.= coolfusion.com/Developers/=0D=0AList archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/inf= usion-email%40eoscape.com/=0D=0ANote: You are subscribed as archive_jab_org / [EMAIL PROTECTED] =0D=0A=3D=3D^=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0D=0A ------=_NextPart_000_041D_01C4E1CC.1EA62740 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3DWindows-1252"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>You need two things for virus scanning = in demo=20 mode:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>- Demo or PrismAV for iMS (you already = have=20 this)</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>- Demo of PrismAV enabled on the SMTP = Server. =20 You will need to contact sales and ask them to enable this on your=20 license. Then, do a live update on your server and restart the = SMTP=20 service.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Regards,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Howie</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A [EMAIL PROTECTED] = href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Lucas=20 Bell</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>inFusion Support = List</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 13, 2004 = 12:18=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [iMS] PrismAV = Demo</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have installed the demo for PrismAV = on our live=20 iMS server, and it doesn't seem to be running when mail comes = in. Will=20 the demo for PrismAV actually work with a production/live version of=20 iMS? It seems like the VSCAN template is never getting ran, even = if all=20 I have in there is a log = statement.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> <!-- iMS Footer -->=0D=0A<p><center><table border=3D1><tr><td align=3Dcenter>=0D= =0AThis list server is Powered by iMS "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"<= br>=0D=0A<hr>=0D=0A<font color=3D"blue" face=3D"arial">This list is provided a= s a free service. Although we will try to address issues=0D=0Ain a timely man= ner, support via this list is not guaranteed. If you require expedited=0D=0As= upport then a support contract is required. Support may be purchased from</fo= nt>=0D=0A<a href=3D"http://www.coolfusion.com/commerce";>http://www.coolfusion.= com/commerce</a><font color=3D"blue" face=3D"arial">. Details regarding suppo= rt options may be reviewed=0D=0Aat: </font><a href=3D"http://www.coolfusion.co= m/SupportOptions.cfm">http://www.coolfusion.com/SupportOptions.cfm</a><font co= lor=3D"blue" face=3D"arial">.</font>=0D=0A<hr>=0D=0ATo leave this list please = complete the form at=0D=0A<a href=3D"http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/";>http:= //www.coolfusion.com/Support/</a><br>=0D=0ANeed an iMS Developer license? Sig= n up for a free license here:=0D=0A<a href=3D"http://www.coolfusion.com/Develo= pers/">http://www.coolfusion.com/Developers/</a><br>=0D=0AList archives: <a hr= ef=3D"http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/";>http://www.ma= il-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/</a><br>=0D=0ANote: You are subscr= ibed as archive_jab_org / [email protected]</td></tr></table></center> ------=_NextPart_000_041D_01C4E1CC.1EA62740-- From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:58:25 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:58:25 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:58:25 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx62.postini.com ([64.18.0.175] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeF4D-0004Sy-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:58:25 -0800 Received: from source ([207.44.210.9]) by exprod5mx62.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:01:04 CST Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by lists.groupstudy.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id iBEFtZt23988; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:55:35 -0500 Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.168.254.36]) by lists.groupstudy.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBEFtUo23982 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:55:30 -0500 Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBEFtQRc010345 GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:55:26 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iBEFtQ9w010343 for GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:55:26 -0500 Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBEFtQaj010340 GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:55:26 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iBEFtQRR010338 for GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:55:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:55:26 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Mike Stuckey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 3550 with 12 gig ports to 3COM compatibility [7:95345] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Mike Stuckey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sequence: 18371 Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk X-no-archive: yes List-Id: <cisco.groupstudy.com> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Owner: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. Yes no on SNMP GBIC copper being used between switches. It is a Packeteer (PacketShaper) and it is inserted on the ethernet connection to each WAN router. We have 3 of them. Traffic to and from on the (fast)ethernet ports. I am trying to get a readable report so I can show everyone the errors. Thanks, --Mike -----Original Message----- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco 3550 with 12 gig ports to 3COM compatibility [7:95334] I'm not certain I understand what you're saying. Let me make sure I'm following you: 1. You have a 3COM switch connected to a Cisco switch. 2. The 3COM switch reports no interface errors 3. The Cisco switch reports no interface errors 4. A monitoring program reports error on those same interfaces Is that correct? What is the monitoring program actually monitoring? Is it grabbing interface stats via SNMP? What sorts of errors are you seeing? My first question, regardless of any errors you're seeing, is why are you hard-setting your speed and duplex settings? Unless you have a really good reason for doing so, they should be set to AUTO. John On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 18:41:26 -0500, Mike Stuckey wrote: > What we are seeing is that on the interface between the equipment on we > have a monitor program it shows errors. The 3com does not show errors > and the Cisco does not show errors. The same monitor does not show > errors between 3com interfaces only 3com to Cisco. > > stlsw2#wr t > Building configuration... > > Current configuration : 4123 bytes > ! > version 12.1 > no service pad > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname stlsw2 > ! > no logging console > > ! > ip subnet-zero > ip routing > ip rcmd rcp-enable > ip rcmd remote-host cwuser 10.151.10.100 cwuser enable > ! > ! > spanning-tree mode pvst > spanning-tree extend system-id > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/1 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/2 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > speed 100 > duplex full > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/3 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > speed 100 > duplex full > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/4 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > speed 100 > duplex full > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/5 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > speed 100 > duplex full > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/6 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > speed 100 > duplex full > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/7 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > speed 100 > duplex full > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/8 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > speed 100 > duplex full > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/9 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/10 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/11 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > ! > interface GigabitEthernet0/12 > switchport mode dynamic desirable > ! > interface Vlan1 > ip address 10.151.1.1 255.255.0.0 > no ip route-cache cef > ! > router eigrp 1 > redistribute static > network 10.0.0.0 > no auto-summary > eigrp log-neighbor-changes > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.151.5.1 > ip route 10.5.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.5.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.5.9.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.5.9.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.14.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.14.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.41.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.41.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.42.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.42.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.43.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.43.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.44.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.44.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.45.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.45.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.50.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.50.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.51.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.51.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.53.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.53.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.54.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.54.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.58.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.58.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.59.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.59.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.61.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.61.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.62.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.62.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.65.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.65.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.67.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.67.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.69.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.69.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.71.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.71.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.77.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.77.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.78.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.25.78.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 10 > ip route 10.25.81.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.81.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.25.84.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.13 > ip route 10.25.84.0 255.255.255.0 10.151.1.12 10 > ip route 10.253.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.151.1.12 > ip route 10.254.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.151.1.13 > ip http server > ! > ! > line con 0 > exec-timeout 0 0 > line vty 0 4 > password > login > line vty 5 15 > password > login > ! > ! > end > > stlsw2# > > Thanks, > --Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Stuckey > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 5:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco 3550 with 12 gig ports to 3COM compatibility problems? > [7:95331] > > Has anyone run into problems with connecting up 3com 7700 switches to > Cisco 3550 switches? I could use some help if anyone has ran into this > problem. > > Thanks, > > --Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=95345&t=95345 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:58:18 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:58:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:58:18 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx59.psmtp.com ([64.18.0.241] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeF45-0004Si-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:58:18 -0800 Received: from source ([166.102.165.167]) by exprod5mx59.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:00:56 PST Received: from rbase.com ([162.39.22.25]) by ispmxmta06-srv.alltel.net with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:00:56 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [RBG7-L] - Finding Font Size Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:00:14 -0600 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Finding Font Size Thread-Index: AcTh9gDgNHth0vOgRGKsfFWVUqfm0A== From: "Charles Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RBG7-L Mailing List) X-MDRcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.64 What is the correct syntax to find font size on a button? =20 I tried: CLEAR VAR vTemp SET VAR vTemp TEXT =3D NULL GETPROPERTY ButtonFont Font_Size 'vtemp' PAUSE 2 USING .vTemp but I keep getting a null value for vTemp From jeff Tue Dec 14 15:58:18 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 07:58:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:58:18 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.0.42] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeF46-0004Sa-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:58:18 -0800 Received: from source ([193.226.140.49]) by exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:00:54 EST Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lug.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF74B7D008460; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:00:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.lug.ro ([193.226.140.49]) by localhost (mail [193.226.140.49]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01430-04; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:00:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lug.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD567D002BA6; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:59:30 +0200 (EET) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list rlug); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:59:29 +0200 (EET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lug.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC2C7D0070F7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:59:28 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.lug.ro ([193.226.140.49]) by localhost (mail [193.226.140.49]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00392-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:59:20 +0200 (EET) Received: from rdsbv.ro (mail.rdsbv.ro [193.231.189.11]) by mail.lug.ro (Postfix) with SMTP id 31A757D002BA6 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:59:20 +0200 (EET) Received: (qmail 3290 invoked by uid 89); 14 Dec 2004 16:55:11 -0000 Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.67. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(82.79.22.8):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.237557 secs); 14 Dec 2004 16:55:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 82-79-22-8.brasov.rdsnet.ro) (82.79.22.8) by rdsbv.ro with SMTP; 14 Dec 2004 16:55:08 -0000 From: Dragos Stefan Pamparau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Romania Data Systems [Brasov Branch] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [rlug] Htb [i know again] Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:57:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by lug.ro's inebriated penguins X-archive-position: 32458 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-original-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-help: <http://www.lug.ro/mlist/> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: rlug <rlug.mail> X-List-ID: rlug <rlug.mail> X-list: rlug X-Virus-Scanned: by lug.ro's inebriated penguins X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 Salut, Am un fisier de configurare pt upload in htb_tools mai complex pentru ca am rate diferite pentru clasele de MAN si traficul extern. Placa de retea este la 10Mb si negocierea decurge ok [ma rog pe RTL8029 numai negociere nu e]. root class`ul este setat in rate 9Mb cu ceil 9Mb burst 12k. ******************************* clasa_man 32kbps cu 1024kbps 5Xcopii 8kbps cu 256kbps clasa_internet 64kbps cu 388kpbs 5Xcopii 8kbps cu 288kbps default 24kbps cu 24kbps ******************************** Toate bune si ok pana cand la traficul in MAN. In momentul in care incepe sa dea drop la pachete da drop in primul rand de pe root-ul interfetei si simultan de pe clasa in care face match : qdisc htb 1: dev eth1 r2q 1 default 10 direct_packets_stat 21 Sent 9024772 bytes 6418 pkts (dropped 84, overlimits 9714 requeues 0) backlog 7p qdisc pfifo 30: dev eth1 parent 1:30 limit 15p Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) qdisc pfifo 23: dev eth1 parent 1:23 limit 15p Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) qdisc pfifo 24: dev eth1 parent 1:24 limit 15p Sent 8985855 bytes 6357 pkts (dropped 84, overlimits 0 requeues 0) backlog 7p Este normal sa faca drop direct de pe root class? Multam si scuze de stress Stefan --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
