It's been a while since I've read about it, but the studies I've seen do show that the death penalty isn't a deterrent. This is of people who have actually ended up either on death row or with a life sentence. I don't remember all of it, but basically the type of person who would commit an act to get them on death row sees death as an easy out.
Also it's a pop-psych misnomer that people who end up in prison do so because of low self-esteem. I recall a study of inmates that found they actually had a higher sense of self-esteem than most people. Makes sense once you think about it. -Kevin On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:04:08 -0500, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wait - how can it NOT be a deterrent? There are people that cut me off at > the traffic circle on my way home every day, I have some enemies, but I > certainly won't kill them. Why? Cause I don't want to spend my life in a > cell or die from Lethal Injection. > > Side note: I probably couldn't kill anyone anyways, no matter how much I > hate them. I'd rather just smoke a doobie and chill my emotions out. I am > just trying to explain that without fear of repercussion, people would be > free to do what they want. > > So, I think that the death penalty does deter violent crime. Maybe some > don't think things through (think crimes of passion here) before committing > them, but for the most part, it works. > > > At 01:50 PM 12/14/2004, you wrote: > >I'm pretty blase on the whole death penalty dispute. I think it's painfully > >obvious that its NOT a deterrant, so that argument is ridiculous. Eye for an > >eye? Yeah, I have no problem with people getting what they have coming to > >them. > > > >So without weighing in at all on whether the death penality is good or not, > >the jury's responsibility is to take the guidelines that the law has layed > >down as to what consitutes a "punishable by death" offense, and then > >determine to best of their ability whether this crime met that criteria. If > >remorse is a criteria, consider it....if it's not, don't. > > > > > > >> Brian Wrote: > > >> But they are separate, aren't they??? > > >> > > > > > > I think you're right about that. Which convinces more that the death > > > penalty isn't warranted in this case. Although I think that's just > > > the jury's recommendation and now it's up to the judge. > > > > > > Still, if the system effectively forces you into putting a guy to > > > death with only circumstantial evidence, I'm uncomfortable with that. > > > > ><snip> > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139845 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:15:34 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:15:34 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:34 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.0.88] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeI90-0007v4-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:34 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:14 PST Received: (qmail 39149 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 18:57:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev.logging.apache.org> Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 39131 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 18:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 39115 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 18:57:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:57:40 -0800 Received: (qmail 21636 invoked by uid 1670); 14 Dec 2004 18:57:11 -0000 Date: 14 Dec 2004 18:57:11 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/pattern PatternConverter.java X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64 yoavs 2004/12/14 10:57:11 Modified: docs HISTORY.txt src/java/org/apache/log4j/pattern PatternConverter.java Log: Bugzilla 17377. Revision Changes Path 1.14 +1 -0 logging-log4j/docs/HISTORY.txt Index: HISTORY.txt =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/logging-log4j/docs/HISTORY.txt,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- HISTORY.txt 14 Dec 2004 18:47:35 -0000 1.13 +++ HISTORY.txt 14 Dec 2004 18:57:10 -0000 1.14 @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ - Fixed Bugzilla 23912: unsafe access to BoundedFIFO in AsyncAppender. [*] + - Fixed Bugzilla 17377: wrong trimming of pattern when left-aligned. [*] November 25, 2004 1.12 +5 -1 logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/pattern/PatternConverter.java Index: PatternConverter.java =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/pattern/PatternConverter.java,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- PatternConverter.java 24 Nov 2004 08:17:02 -0000 1.11 +++ PatternConverter.java 14 Dec 2004 18:57:11 -0000 1.12 @@ -91,7 +91,11 @@ int len = s.length(); if (len > max) { - output.write(s.substring(len - max)); + if(leftAlign) { + output.write(s.substring(0, max)); + } else { + output.write(s.substring(len - max)); + } } else if (len < min) { if (leftAlign) { output.write(s.toString()); --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:15:41 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:15:41 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:41 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx32.postini.com ([64.18.0.187] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeI97-0007vX-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:41 -0800 Received: from source ([64.118.64.245]) by exprod5mx32.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:18:17 CST Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOST with ESMTP id 86A6E7E42C4F53488A0AA4BAC30865D6 Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:19:24 -0500 Subject: Existentialism (was Re: death for scott peterson) From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:17:20 -0600 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 Heh. I read The Plague while stranded overnight in an airport because of a storm grounding all planes. There was an odd symmetry to it. Obviously people weren't dying in the airport, but the idea of people being unexpectedly trapped together. There was a foreign couple, from Switzerland I believe, that barely spoke English and weren't terribly familiar with our payphones and dialing long distance here. So I got the number for their relatives at their destination and dialed it up on my calling card. I didn't see them again until the morning, but it looked like they got sorted out and were getting out fine. I very much thought of Sartre as a Humanist while reading The Plague. -Kevin On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:46:53 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interesting. I got into that particular theme because my professor > said that Sartre was a humanist while Camus was not. I came to see > that she was looking at La chute (The Fall?) and The Flies whereas I > was looking at Nausea and The Plague. But still. Sartre strikes me as > being very coldly intellectual overall. A lot of his characters are > Resistance fighters though, which may account for it. (Les mains > sales.-Dirty Hands?) > > Kobo Abe? Tell me more. > > Dana > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:20 -0500, Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana wrote: > > > He was convicted of murdering a man because he didn't cry at his > > > mother's funeral. > > > (Did some master's thesis work on Satre and Camus,) > > > > > > The fact that I do think Peterson was guilty doesn't change the fact > > > that I can see the parallel here in the thought process. > > > > > > > > > Dana, > > > > We have to have a talk. I'm a huge Kierkegaard fan. As such I'm a huge > > Sartre and Camus fan. I've been meaning to read more Kobo Abe books but > > I've only managed to read Women in the Dunes. Personally, I find > > Satre's work more intellectually convincing but the power of Camus' > > humanity can not be overshadowed. His personal integrity and compassion > > nudges him past Sartre. > > > > -- > > 2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant. > > > > Ron Artest: Extremely flawed, very accidental, semi-martyr > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139818 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:15:42 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:15:42 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:42 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.0.41] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeI98-0007vg-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:42 -0800 Received: from source ([131.118.94.2]) by exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:18:21 EST X-Mailer: Lyris ListManager Web Interface Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:04:02 -0500 Subject: Re: Psychology & Religion [Was: Famous Atheist...] To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Jim Guinee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S: 5.50081/99.62189 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.64 >>Very few here seem to want to allow "divine intervention" as a POSSIBLE causal variable>> Michael Scoles: There's a reason for that: http://www.sciencecartoonsplus.com/gallery.htm Jim Guinee: That's great!!!! --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:15:37 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:15:37 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:37 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx95.postini.com ([64.18.0.83] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeI93-0007v0-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:37 -0800 Received: from source ([64.118.64.245]) by exprod5mx95.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:18:13 EST Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOST with ESMTP id BC675081ACDEA14BAF36CB1BDCD027BA Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:19:50 -0500 Subject: Re: death for scott peterson From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:17:43 -0600 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.64 It's been a while since I've read about it, but the studies I've seen do show that the death penalty isn't a deterrent. This is of people who have actually ended up either on death row or with a life sentence. I don't remember all of it, but basically the type of person who would commit an act to get them on death row sees death as an easy out. Also it's a pop-psych misnomer that people who end up in prison do so because of low self-esteem. I recall a study of inmates that found they actually had a higher sense of self-esteem than most people. Makes sense once you think about it. -Kevin On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:04:08 -0500, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wait - how can it NOT be a deterrent? There are people that cut me off at > the traffic circle on my way home every day, I have some enemies, but I > certainly won't kill them. Why? Cause I don't want to spend my life in a > cell or die from Lethal Injection. > > Side note: I probably couldn't kill anyone anyways, no matter how much I > hate them. I'd rather just smoke a doobie and chill my emotions out. I am > just trying to explain that without fear of repercussion, people would be > free to do what they want. > > So, I think that the death penalty does deter violent crime. Maybe some > don't think things through (think crimes of passion here) before committing > them, but for the most part, it works. > > > At 01:50 PM 12/14/2004, you wrote: > >I'm pretty blase on the whole death penalty dispute. I think it's painfully > >obvious that its NOT a deterrant, so that argument is ridiculous. Eye for an > >eye? Yeah, I have no problem with people getting what they have coming to > >them. > > > >So without weighing in at all on whether the death penality is good or not, > >the jury's responsibility is to take the guidelines that the law has layed > >down as to what consitutes a "punishable by death" offense, and then > >determine to best of their ability whether this crime met that criteria. If > >remorse is a criteria, consider it....if it's not, don't. > > > > > > >> Brian Wrote: > > >> But they are separate, aren't they??? > > >> > > > > > > I think you're right about that. Which convinces more that the death > > > penalty isn't warranted in this case. Although I think that's just > > > the jury's recommendation and now it's up to the judge. > > > > > > Still, if the system effectively forces you into putting a guy to > > > death with only circumstantial evidence, I'm uncomfortable with that. > > > > ><snip> > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139845 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:16:58 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:16:58 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:16:58 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx32.postini.com ([64.18.0.187] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIAM-0007vr-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:16:58 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx32.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:19:37 PST Received: (qmail 18891 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 17:49:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: "Struts Developers List" <dev.struts.apache.org> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 18846 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 17:49:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:49:11 -0800 Received: (qmail 69530 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 17:48:51 -0000 Received: from localhost.hyperreal.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2004 17:48:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BApache_Struts_Wiki=5D_Updated=3A__StrutsReloadingConfig?= Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:48:46 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64 Date: 2004-12-14T09:48:45 Editor: HassanReyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsReloadingConfig URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsReloadingConfig no comment Change Log: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- @@ -82,3 +82,9 @@ = ---- = +Hassan Reyes: + + I tried to use a PlugIn to add some properties config beans to the form = bean config every time when the instanceof my interface be true. + it was somthing like this: formBeanCfg.addFormPropertyConfig(myFormProp= ertyConfig); It was because i'm using DynaForms and what i want to do= is like a extend my DynaFormBean but with my owns properties. Why on a Plu= gIn? Well because the FormBeanCfgs are not freeze jet... = + + Everithing looks good, but when i run my app the dispatch method has th= e form parameter null and i really don't know why... Does it is a good idea= ? or there is a best way? Thks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:17:00 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:17:00 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:17:00 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx31.postini.com ([64.18.0.186] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIAO-0007w0-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:17:00 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx31.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:19:40 PST Received: (qmail 18891 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 17:49:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: "Struts Developers List" <dev.struts.apache.org> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 18846 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 17:49:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:49:11 -0800 Received: (qmail 69530 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 17:48:51 -0000 Received: from localhost.hyperreal.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2004 17:48:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BApache_Struts_Wiki=5D_Updated=3A__StrutsReloadingConfig?= Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:48:46 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64 Date: 2004-12-14T09:48:45 Editor: HassanReyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsReloadingConfig URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsReloadingConfig no comment Change Log: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- @@ -82,3 +82,9 @@ = ---- = +Hassan Reyes: + + I tried to use a PlugIn to add some properties config beans to the form = bean config every time when the instanceof my interface be true. + it was somthing like this: formBeanCfg.addFormPropertyConfig(myFormProp= ertyConfig); It was because i'm using DynaForms and what i want to do= is like a extend my DynaFormBean but with my owns properties. Why on a Plu= gIn? Well because the FormBeanCfgs are not freeze jet... = + + Everithing looks good, but when i run my app the dispatch method has th= e form parameter null and i really don't know why... Does it is a good idea= ? or there is a best way? Thks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:18:50 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:18:50 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:50 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx61.postini.com ([64.18.0.174] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeICA-0007yZ-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:50 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx61.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:21:30 CST Received: (qmail 48199 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 19:00:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" <lucene-dev.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 48159 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 19:00:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 48145 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 19:00:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:00:17 -0800 Received: (qmail 23254 invoked by uid 1912); 14 Dec 2004 19:00:01 -0000 Date: 14 Dec 2004 19:00:01 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search Searcher.java Searchable.java X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64 dnaber 2004/12/14 11:00:01 Modified: src/java/org/apache/lucene/search Searcher.java Searchable.java Log: document that TooManyClauses is thrown by several methods Revision Changes Path 1.13 +10 -2 jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java Index: Searcher.java =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- Searcher.java 29 Mar 2004 22:48:04 -0000 1.12 +++ Searcher.java 14 Dec 2004 19:00:01 -0000 1.13 @@ -22,19 +22,25 @@ * Implements some common utility methods. */ public abstract class Searcher implements Searchable { - /** Returns the documents matching <code>query</code>. */ + + /** Returns the documents matching <code>query</code>. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses + */ public final Hits search(Query query) throws IOException { return search(query, (Filter)null); } /** Returns the documents matching <code>query</code> and - <code>filter</code>. */ + * <code>filter</code>. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses + */ public Hits search(Query query, Filter filter) throws IOException { return new Hits(this, query, filter); } /** Returns documents matching <code>query</code> sorted by * <code>sort</code>. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses */ public Hits search(Query query, Sort sort) throws IOException { @@ -43,6 +49,7 @@ /** Returns documents matching <code>query</code> and <code>filter</code>, * sorted by <code>sort</code>. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses */ public Hits search(Query query, Filter filter, Sort sort) throws IOException { @@ -61,6 +68,7 @@ * <p>Note: The <code>score</code> passed to this method is a raw score. * In other words, the score will not necessarily be a float whose value is * between 0 and 1. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses */ public void search(Query query, HitCollector results) throws IOException { 1.13 +7 -1 jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searchable.java Index: Searchable.java =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searchable.java,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- Searchable.java 6 Aug 2004 20:09:19 -0000 1.12 +++ Searchable.java 14 Dec 2004 19:00:01 -0000 1.13 @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ * @param query to match documents * @param filter if non-null, a bitset used to eliminate some documents * @param results to receive hits + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses */ void search(Query query, Filter filter, HitCollector results) throws IOException; @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ * * <p>Applications should usually call [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searcher#search(Query)} or * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searcher#search(Query,Filter)} instead. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses */ TopDocs search(Query query, Filter filter, int n) throws IOException; @@ -79,7 +81,9 @@ */ Document doc(int i) throws IOException; - /** Expert: called to re-write queries into primitive queries. */ + /** Expert: called to re-write queries into primitive queries. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses + */ Query rewrite(Query query) throws IOException; /** Returns an Explanation that describes how <code>doc</code> scored against @@ -89,6 +93,7 @@ * and, for good performance, should not be displayed with every hit. * Computing an explanation is as expensive as executing the query over the * entire index. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses */ Explanation explain(Query query, int doc) throws IOException; @@ -99,6 +104,7 @@ * * <p>Applications should usually call [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Searcher#search(Query,Filter,Sort)} instead. + * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses */ TopFieldDocs search(Query query, Filter filter, int n, Sort sort) throws IOException; --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:18:47 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:18:47 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:47 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx120.postini.com ([64.18.0.34] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIC7-0007yB-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:47 -0800 Received: from source ([132.175.109.20]) by exprod5mx120.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:21:26 PST Received: from 132.175.109.4 by mm02snlnto.son.sandia.gov with ESMTP ( Tumbleweed MMS SMTP Relay 01 (MMS v5.6.3)); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:18:05 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 914ACFB1-8EBC-470E-882B-54A00EED9786 Received: from mailgate2.sandia.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate2.sandia.gov (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBEJHucH022213 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:17:56 -0700 (MST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mailgate2.sandia.gov ( 8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id iBEJHuRP022212 for jess-users-outgoing; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:17:56 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: mailgate2.sandia.gov: majordom set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f X-Server-Uuid: 2C1074A8-2B28-4DE3-9F7D-FF40AE090BA2 X-Server-Uuid: 914ACFB1-8EBC-470E-882B-54A00EED9786 Subject: JESS: Jess on the server side - how many engines/data sharing/threading? * Newbie Alert* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:37:27 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WBLN0014/Facility/World Bank ( Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 12/14/2004 01:37:29 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 6DA1ED791J0354865-01-01 X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.1.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.12.13.53 X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.1.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.12.13.53 X-WSS-ID: 6DA1E3D213W507850-01-01 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-WSS-ID: 6DA1E3ED1J0359414-03-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0000) gt3 gt2 GT1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64 I apologize if the question has been asked and answered - I am new to Jess and rules engines. I must say that the Jess In Action book was very helpful and I was in fact able to get a set of rules up and running for a Dependency Management module (things depend on resources which depend on other resources etc). Anyhow, here is my question/// We plan to use Jess in a multi-threaded, j2ee environment; one of the applications is similar to the catalog example in the book. The characteristics in general are: - large # of 'base' facts - of the order of 100,000 to 200,000 (similar to catalog entries) - the base facts change slowly - moderate load of about 1-5 requests per second - the rules engine is invoked for a new fact which is asserted, conclusion reached and then retracted Given that, should we have RETE multiple engines that are instantiated? Perhaps a pool of 10 that we can use on demand? How about data sharing? When the base facts are updated, the updates need to be applied to all the RETE engines. -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:18:48 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:18:48 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:48 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIC8-0007yK-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:48 -0800 Received: from source ([66.35.250.220]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:21:12 CST Received: from sc8-sf-list2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.8] helo=projects.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CeIEO-0002bv-0K; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:21:08 -0800 Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CeIE6-00037c-Ig for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:50 -0800 Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.27]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CeIE5-00078a-Lp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:50 -0800 Received: from Merlin (whitegoat.xs4all.nl [80.126.28.207]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBEJKjUx047256 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:20:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Wilbert van Dolleweerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'NAnt Users'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4E21A.61E2D820" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcTiEf/WeXDzYF7GS+GWvGhk7ZOzow== X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) Subject: [Nant-users] Projectfile becomes invalid XML and cannot be parsed by Nant - the followup Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: Discussion of NAnt features and usage <nant-users.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nant-users> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:20:40 +0100 X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0000) gt3 gt2 GT1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4E21A.61E2D820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello everyone, (For people who don't know what I'm rambling about, please read the included posts first). Just a small update to let you know that I've submitted the bug to the Microsoft Product Feedback Center. I was referred to this site by a Microsoft employee. Stupid thing is that you can only give feedback about newer Visual Studio versions (2005 beta 1 and up). I still posted it there, because there are more postings that refer to older versions of Visual Studio. Anyway, please take the time to vote for the bug or add comments. It will increase the likelyhood of someone at Microsoft actually looking at the damn thing :^) http://tinyurl.com/66c42 Thanks in advance, Wilbert van Dolleweerd ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4E21A.61E2D820 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment From: "Wilbert van Dolleweerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Nant-Users \(E-mail\)'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Nant-users] Known bug in Nant? Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:38:05 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcTa8S1tpZqOfYUWS4OomnLicoNBmg== X-XS4ALL-DNSBL-Checked: mxdrop28.xs4all.nl checked 66.35.250.220 against DNS blacklists X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-UIDL: 1102268375._smtp.mxdrop28.79635,S=4493 X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users>,<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users>,<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> x-mailman-version: 2.0.9-sf.net x-spam-report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net.See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001-4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%[score: 0.0000]0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't x-spam-score: -4.8 (----) Hello, Don't know if the following is considered a bug in Nant. Take the following: - A Visual Studio solution that includes a gif-file with the name 'spin&blk.gif' in its project. - A Nant build that uses the <solution> task to compile the solution. Nant will choke on the filename of the gif-file in the cs.project file with the following error: " Error loading project 'C:\Temp\WindowsApplication1\WindowsApplication1\WindowsApplication1.csproj' . An error occurred while parsing EntityName. Line 119, position 37. " This is because of the following line in the projectfile: " <File RelPath = "spin&blk.gif" BuildAction = "Content" /> " I know there are ways to circumvent this behaviour, but shouldn't Nant handle this error more gracefully? Complete example that demonstrates this behaviour on http://www.xs4all.nl/~getit/windowsapplication1.zip (Visual Studio 2003 solution) Opinions wanted! (Yes, I'm using the latest version of Nant :^) Kind regards, Wilbert van Dolleweerd ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4E21A.61E2D820 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment Reply-To: "Brad Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Brad Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "NAnt Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Known bug in Nant? Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:56:53 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcTa/GL0vOyyrV5ZR5Kx3Ebf9Qzntw== X-XS4ALL-DNSBL-Checked: mxdrop41.xs4all.nl checked 66.35.250.220 against DNS blacklists X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-UIDL: 1102273101._smtp.mxdrop41.92081,S=5226 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users>,<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users>,<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> x-mailman-version: 2.0.9-sf.net x-spam-report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net.See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001-4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%[score: 0.0000] x-spam-score: -4.9 (----) Although the Visual Studio project files look like XML, and will usually parse with an XML parser, they're not actually legal XML because of things like this. (It should've been obvious they weren't being done with a real XML generator when you look at their layout... no XML generator I've ever seen would create such ridiculously white-space heavy elements.) I think there are three options: 0. Don't use filenames that cause the problem. 1. Scan the file contents before parsing, and fix up errors like this, THEN use the XML parser to parse the fixed-up version. 2. Write a new parser and avoid the XML parser altogether. Option 0 isn't very good, but obviously is the easiest choice if it's something you have control over. It's also coincidentally the only option available to someone who isn't willing to get in and fix the solution task. Long term, option 1 seems best at first glance. While the document isn't XML, it would take very little work to make it XML. Although it will, on first glance seem kind of messy, it surely is a LOT less work than actually writing a parser. In fact, option 1 seems to me like it could be done in an afternoon by a properly motivated individual. ;) - Brad -- Brad Wilson http://www.dotnetdevs.com/ http://dotnetguy.techieswithcats.com/ "Why do I think that people who live and breathe SQL are from a distant alien culture?" - Stuart Celarier on the WTOT mailing list ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4E21A.61E2D820-- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:18:58 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:18:58 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:58 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx97.postini.com ([64.18.0.85] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeICI-0007zB-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:58 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx97.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:21:37 PST Received: (qmail 52871 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 16:20:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 49232 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 16:19:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from 66.111.0.243.nyinternet.net (HELO confixx.bestiole.ch) (66.111.0.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:18:56 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.163] (michel.wod.ch [62.220.137.25]) by confixx.bestiole.ch (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBEGIGH11918 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:18:19 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-32-179846190; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Do we have a "powered by Apache Cocoon" logo? Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:18:16 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 --Apple-Mail-32-179846190 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Le 14 d=E9c. 04, =E0 16:43, Christoph Gaffga (triplemind.com) a =E9crit = : > some time ago I was also looking for that. Zhe only I found was a=20 > "build with" logo. It was somewhere under cocoon.apache.org or in the=20= > wiki. Can't remember, but I have a copy on > http://www.triplemind.com/third-party.html Thanks for the pointer - I like the idea, only it's the old logo color=20= (IIUC, I assume http://cocoon.apache.org/images/cocoon-logo.gif is our=20= official color now?). I'll try to talk my daughter into doing a new one, unless someone beats=20= us to it. She's usually pretty good at this. Can someone help with opening the cocoon2.ai file, or another vector=20 version of same? As mentioned previously, when I try to open it with my=20= Illustrator 10, it says "incorrect operator: 'd0'". -Bertrand --Apple-Mail-32-179846190 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIGRTCCAv4w ggJnoAMCAQICAw0p3DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDQxMDA0MTQyMzU0WhcNMDUxMDA0MTQyMzU0WjBtMRMwEQYDVQQE EwpEZWxhY3JldGF6MREwDwYDVQQqEwhCZXJ0cmFuZDEcMBoGA1UEAxMTQmVydHJhbmQgRGVsYWNy ZXRhejElMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYWYmRlbGFjcmV0YXpAYXBhY2hlLm9yZzCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALXTKyJRGv/islEqVhG+iE8FSGe+4ikts9rca6OUPD4CJ+vYcXS5 arpv87lSoi0cyC8QkjB6MzsXzsraQjyO3EOeFOcNWN1XFe0Qc2uqVBSdYM6LtaSs4A1OYSweKKFK iNscMmlsIIKXvZ8xb4QmbZZSkklh5tWdJh+aNNV0m++NEUXRsqRffz6eHRmf0RjYmwxBig3KpzmH dPAcGTtDcI9O7p2OpQ7zPFAt9n4tMPx6makpU97HeGKqvWPIaaprQa/4nLhTcWDaZ1AHyFYNhzru gyRI0SDyp6OijuUZKXsaESJWEEySke18l6aZbsflzXpoCMTS9ce93fJ0uBFax/kCAwEAAaMzMDEw IQYDVR0RBBowGIEWYmRlbGFjcmV0YXpAYXBhY2hlLm9yZzAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBAUAA4GBAEBia6WrujKxJoVkme3aFszr/WmH4x+mIj+AmrAVG2tGB+RO0yCK/aal3wLzMBYn O6zr7TPW2PqOUmMGeP7Pgr5KSMn4rlfM+Hdfd/IvqCpHuWcqq/VAto47XF2cZyGNw32EdGx8IeCe 6BFaoRh6yJdS3GkOnbqSNCVTih/PdRlxMIIDPzCCAqigAwIBAgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB 0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3du MRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2 aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJ KoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoX DTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5n IChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENB MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDEpjxVc1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31 W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAKMNcCY1osiRVwjt3J8CuFWqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3 PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTXp6a7n2XRxSpUhQ9IBH+nttE8YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIG A1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwQwYDVR0fBDwwOjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29t L1RoYXd0ZVBlcnNvbmFsRnJlZW1haWxDQS5jcmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAc MRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwyLTEzODANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswN o2asZw9/r6y+whehQ5aUnX9MIbj4Nh+qLZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSe JVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3dqZw5jowgT2Vfldr394fWxghOrvbqNOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHTHUb/ XV9lTzGCAucwggLjAgEBMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0 aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5n IENBAgMNKdwwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAVMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQUxDxcNMDQxMjE0MTYxODE3WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUL/m9uwahWjZWQ9AvGH0z1bSO APIweAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMWswaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1 bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0ECAw0p3DB6BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFroGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVl bWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMNKdwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAple5cPt7c9pKjDRaDmlPwGBu 2cQfvb34Zwhzp+JiaZeRoYkkoRy/RF9pw1zydl6oCApMgQH08tMvK7fm6A18I4FDDNyzBSXdiR87 nt4sLmMSSGLDFLDsd4F97cLGzFCiE54YH4EuAHnHXv3WCX8+eXc4pDXTwN3/PsRkGMRJ2ZE6ggJb Lfi/GE2g1etmC4sY9++Xk0ecspY5Cjsb1kgI+uz/U0XIWZXwWhDNzuexrGGhz8FkamIuQ1Jar0A4 XryMPRZtsCI7NM3mpSMwhcul9cY7KgB30SElRQ7O0sRGF5f3n3pvWRdrk67wEJ6By9pcKaPp7ZLH gnkMzW7AV2DAwAAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-32-179846190-- From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:18:53 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:18:53 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:53 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeICD-0007yl-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:53 -0800 Received: from source ([66.35.250.220]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:21:17 PST Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.7] helo=projects.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ce0z0-000118-Ay; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:56:06 -0800 Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Ce0yQ-0001EM-JL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:55:30 -0800 Received: from colo-br-02.atl.jboss.com ([216.24.169.35]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1Ce0yP-0003JK-Op for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:55:30 -0800 Received: from colo-br-02.atl.jboss.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo-br-02.atl.jboss.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBE0tSYc015767 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:55:28 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) Subject: [JBoss-user] [JCA/JBoss] - Re: Sample deployment info for JCA 1.5 inbound RA Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: The JBoss User main mailing list <jboss-user.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=jboss-user> X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:55:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:55:28 -0500 (EST) X-pstn-levels: (S:94.87830/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0000) gt3 gt2 GT1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 There is no *-ds.xml for an inbound resource adaptor as the integration point is an MDB. See the testsuite/src/jca/{inflow,inflowmdb} and associated source for an example. The testsuite is part of the source download. ejb-jar.xml: | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <ejb-jar xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; | xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee | http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb-jar_2_1.xsd"; | version="2.1"> | | <enterprise-beans> | | <message-driven> | <ejb-name>TestMDB</ejb-name> | <ejb-class>org.jboss.test.jca.inflowmdb.TestMDBMessageListener</ejb-class> | <messaging-type>org.jboss.test.jca.inflow.TestMessageListener</messaging-type> | <activation-config> | <activation-config-property> | <activation-config-property-name>name</activation-config-property-name> | <activation-config-property-value>testInflow</activation-config-property-value> | </activation-config-property> | <!-- Other non-String properties to test the ActivationSpec java bean --> | <activation-config-property> | <activation-config-property-name>anInt</activation-config-property-name> | <activation-config-property-value>5</activation-config-property-value> | </activation-config-property> | <activation-config-property> | <activation-config-property-name>anInteger</activation-config-property-name> | <activation-config-property-value>55</activation-config-property-value> | </activation-config-property> | <activation-config-property> | <activation-config-property-name>localhost</activation-config-property-name> | <activation-config-property-value>127.0.0.1</activation-config-property-value> | </activation-config-property> | <activation-config-property> | <activation-config-property-name>props</activation-config-property-name> | <activation-config-property-value> | key1=value1 | key2=value2 | key3=value3 | </activation-config-property-value> | </activation-config-property> | </activation-config> | <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type> | </message-driven> | | </enterprise-beans> | | <assembly-descriptor> | | <container-transaction> | <method> | <ejb-name>TestMDB</ejb-name> | <method-name>*</method-name> | </method> | <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute> | </container-transaction> | | </assembly-descriptor> | | </ejb-jar> | jboss.xml: | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | | <jboss> | <enterprise-beans> | <message-driven> | <ejb-name>TestMDB</ejb-name> | <resource-adapter-name>jcainflow.rar</resource-adapter-name> | </message-driven> | </enterprise-beans> | </jboss> | ra.xml: | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <connector xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; | xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee | http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/connector_1_5.xsd"; | version="1.5"> | | <description>Test Resource Adapter for new jca 1.5 features</description> | <display-name>Inflow Test Resource Adapter</display-name> | <vendor-name>JBoss, Inc</vendor-name> | <eis-type>JBoss Testsuite</eis-type> | <resourceadapter-version>4.0</resourceadapter-version> | | <license> | <description> | COPYRIGHT AND PERMISSION NOTICE | Copyright (c) 2004 JBoss, Inc | This is released under the terms of the LGPL. | See gnu.org for details. | </description> | <license-required>true</license-required> | </license> | | <resourceadapter> | <resourceadapter-class>org.jboss.test.jca.inflow.TestResourceAdapter</resourceadapter-class> | | <inbound-resourceadapter> | <messageadapter> | <messagelistener> | <messagelistener-type>org.jboss.test.jca.inflow.TestMessageListener</messagelistener-type> | <activationspec> | <activationspec-class>org.jboss.test.jca.inflow.TestActivationSpec</activationspec-class> | <required-config-property> | <config-property-name>name</config-property-name> | </required-config-property> | <required-config-property> | <description>An int between 1-10</description> | <config-property-name>anInt</config-property-name> | </required-config-property> | <required-config-property> | <description>An Integer between 50-100</description> | <config-property-name>anInteger</config-property-name> | </required-config-property> | <required-config-property> | <description>The 127.0.0.1 address</description> | <config-property-name>localhost</config-property-name> | </required-config-property> | <required-config-property> | <description>java.util.Properties of the form key1=*;key2=*;...</description> | <config-property-name>props</config-property-name> | </required-config-property> | </activationspec> | </messagelistener> | </messageadapter> | </inbound-resourceadapter> | | </resourceadapter> | </connector> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3858436#3858436 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3858436 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:18:56 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:18:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:56 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeICG-0007z2-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:18:56 -0800 Received: from source ([132.175.109.21]) by exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:21:36 PST Received: from 132.175.109.4 by mm02snlnto.son.sandia.gov with ESMTP ( Tumbleweed MMS SMTP Relay 01 (MMS v5.6.3)); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:18:11 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 914ACFB1-8EBC-470E-882B-54A00EED9786 Received: from mailgate2.sandia.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate2.sandia.gov (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBEJHucH022213 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:17:56 -0700 (MST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mailgate2.sandia.gov ( 8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id iBEJHuRP022212 for jess-users-outgoing; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:17:56 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: mailgate2.sandia.gov: majordom set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f X-Server-Uuid: 2C1074A8-2B28-4DE3-9F7D-FF40AE090BA2 X-Server-Uuid: 914ACFB1-8EBC-470E-882B-54A00EED9786 Subject: JESS: Jess on the server side - how many engines/data sharing/threading? * Newbie Alert* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:37:27 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WBLN0014/Facility/World Bank ( Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 12/14/2004 01:37:29 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 6DA1ED791J0354865-01-01 X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.1.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.12.13.53 X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.1.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.12.13.53 X-WSS-ID: 6DA1E3D213W507850-01-01 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-WSS-ID: 6DA1E3ED1J0359414-06-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64 I apologize if the question has been asked and answered - I am new to Jess and rules engines. I must say that the Jess In Action book was very helpful and I was in fact able to get a set of rules up and running for a Dependency Management module (things depend on resources which depend on other resources etc). Anyhow, here is my question/// We plan to use Jess in a multi-threaded, j2ee environment; one of the applications is similar to the catalog example in the book. The characteristics in general are: - large # of 'base' facts - of the order of 100,000 to 200,000 (similar to catalog entries) - the base facts change slowly - moderate load of about 1-5 requests per second - the rules engine is invoked for a new fact which is asserted, conclusion reached and then retracted Given that, should we have RETE multiple engines that are instantiated? Perhaps a pool of 10 that we can use on demand? How about data sharing? When the base facts are updated, the updates need to be applied to all the RETE engines. -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:19:37 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:19:37 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:19:37 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx119.postini.com ([64.18.0.33] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeICv-0007zZ-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:19:37 -0800 Received: from source ([12.107.209.244]) by exprod5mx119.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:22:16 EST Received: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261592AbULNTVx (ORCPT <rfc822;[email protected]>); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:21:53 -0500 Received: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by vger.kernel.org id S261620AbULNTVx (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-newbie-outgoing>); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:21:53 -0500 Received: from web02-nyc.clicvu.com ([209.10.150.72]:20236 "EHLO web02-nyc.clicvu.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261592AbULNTVv (ORCPT <rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:21:51 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.72] by web02-nyc.clicvu.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64039U1000L100S0V35) with SMTP id com for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:16:51 -0500 Received: from zimage (unknown [202.154.136.3]) by desire.actrix.co.nz (Postfix) with SMTP id F04F015BDE; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:21:46 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:20:29 +1300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux-Newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Create files with specific sizes? Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.8; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64 SVisor wrote: > > >>is there any way (some command) that will allow me to > >>create blank files with specific sizes, eg 1MB, 5MB, 10MB etc. > ... > > dd if=/dev/zero of=file1 bs=1k count=1024 > > I wanted a file of garbage, not zeroes. Just pick a sufficiently large file or device for your input stream. For example: dd if=/dev/hda of=file1 bs=1k count=1024 Cheers, Steven ____________________________ http://www.basiclinux.com.ru - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:20:23 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:20:23 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:23 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx28.postini.com ([64.18.0.183] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIDf-0007zs-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:23 -0800 Received: from source ([80.34.61.137]) by exprod5mx28.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:22:57 PST Received: (qmail 12396 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2004 20:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: moderator for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 12359 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 20:31:54 -0000 From: "Ruth Zamorano Gallego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mindfood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:20:36 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Subject: [mindfood] II congreso JavaHispano X-pstn-levels: (S:94.26123/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 Hola, Ma�ana y pasado se celebra el II congreso Java Hispano: evento hispanoamericano independiente celebrado entorno a las tecnolog�as Java. Este congreso es un punto de encuentro e intercambio de ideas para empresas, universidades, y, en general, individuos interesados en las tecnolog�as Java y arquitectura empresarial, que facilita el intercambio mutuo de experiencias y la creaci�n de nuevas relaciones tanto en el �mbito comercial como en el de la investigaci�n. Esta vez tendr� lugar en la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de M�stoles. En la p�gina http://congreso.javahispano.org/ podeis consultar el programa. La asistencia es gratuita previo registro, aunque se ha cerrado el plazo para inscribirse online, se puede hacer in situ. -- Ruth Zamorano, --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:20:44 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:20:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:44 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx117.postini.com ([64.18.0.89] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIE0-00080L-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:44 -0800 Received: from source ([62.193.206.9]) by exprod5mx117.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:23:22 MST Received: (qmail 5758 invoked by uid 507); 14 Dec 2004 19:03:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: moderator for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 22884 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 17:47:04 -0000 From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Master e Slave #3085 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:47:37 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:92.39703/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.64 Desculpem a minha ignorancia, mas digam-me: O que e essa coisa de MASTER E SLAVE? Os PC s tem 2 Discos Rigidos? E se tem, pode-se guardar informa=E7ao nos dois? Ou o slave e uma parte do master?! Estou confuso Romeu sardinha (De: Romeo Sardinha ) ____________________________________________________________________ Clube Inform=E1tica =96 http://www.clubeinformatica.com =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> J=E1 nas bancas a edi=E7=E3o n=BA 91 <<< PC MANUAL - GUIA DO COMPUTADOR =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Cancelar? Devolva esta mensagem para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________________ From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:20:39 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:20:39 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:39 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx58.postini.com ([64.18.0.238] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIDv-000801-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:39 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx58.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:23:19 CST Received: (qmail 36875 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 17:54:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: "JMeter Developers List" <jmeter-dev.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "JMeter Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 36748 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 17:54:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 216.239.56.250 as permitted sender) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (216.239.56.250) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:54:43 -0800 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so345688cwc for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:54:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=a/KSsY4O308vBx3bFDYoHi7auPY9RJ8blwGIbNED2pxw1S4s6OiN0XU0KMTHnCObbJFxk3GmjhtdNZzYJ7MkdFKvFyv6GCCeNTXP4LItt5jFY1t+j2SZGFcyV+iB7ausKlxD+HNS0ovm6eABneWQwoExawm1H3GzWfJEv9L3UAE= Received: by 10.11.94.56 with SMTP id r56mr672346cwb; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:54:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.11.118.33 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:54:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:54:35 +0000 From: sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: JMeter Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: HTTP Request Serialization Cc: JMeter Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 [This question and the answers really belong on the JMeter User list, not the developers list., so I've added the User list. Please remove the Developer list when replying further.] =3D=3D=3D If there's only one servlet with a single URL, then this is trivial - just write the parameters to a file, and use _StringFromFile() [and perhaps __spli()] or __CSVRead() to extract the parameters into variables that are passed into the Sampler. Even for multiple URLs, this is still easy, as variables can be used in the HTTP Sampler to provide the URL Path etc. You just need to create a simple test plan with the appropriate fields replaced by variables. Try it with a few simple examples, and it will then be clear how best to collect the data. See also: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-jmeter/JMeterFAQ Items 7 and 8 S. On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:57:09 +0100, Jos=E9 Mar=EDa Ti=F1ana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The main idea is to introduce some code in the Servlet, and this code > should write to somewhere (database,file, etc) all the params of each > HttpRequest. > Some time later, when the application has been used for an amount of > users, use the files that were generated by the Servlet to launch > JMeter and try to reproduced the visits, but in greater amount. > We are interesting in look at the time for each reponse to work. But > the exactly metrics are still not decided exactly. > For me the harder issue is how to write the correct files for JMeter. >=20 > Thanks a lot. >=20 >=20 > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:43:15 -0500, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've done things similar to this. what we did was we appended all the > > request parameters to the access log using request filters. We also > > tacked on other things like performance metrics for queries, and page > > rendering. > > > > can you give me a better idea of what you're thinking of? > > > > peter > > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:59:20 +0100, Jos=E9 Mar=EDa Ti=F1ana > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks, that useful. But I want to do something more. The original > > > idea is to write some code in our own application, so in production i= t > > > generates the test plan in some file so later we can reproduced the > > > original charge, orderr and amount of visits. > > > I=B4m thinking in use some clases from JMeter itself, but I=B4m a lit= te > > > bit lost about this fact. > > > Can you help me? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Jos=E9 M=AA > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:16:03 -0500, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro= te: > > > > it supports the common log format. one of these days i'll write a > > > > parser to handle the extended log format. > > > > > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 18:14:04 +0000, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, use the ProxyServer to record a test plan, or use the Access= Log > > > > > sampler to replay the contents of an HTTP server log. I think it > > > > > supports Tomcat format log files - check the documentation. > > > > > > > > > > S. > > > > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:08:42 +0100, Jos=E9 Mar=EDa Ti=F1ana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I=B4m new in JMeter and I want to use it to test a entire appli= cation. > > > > > > The problem is that configure all the HTTP Request that can be = sent to > > > > > > the server is impossible due to the amount of them. > > > > > > There are some task that allows to serializate a HttpRequest in= to a > > > > > > some type of file that JMeter can read lately? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Jos=E9 M=AA > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:20:41 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:20:41 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:41 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx122.postini.com ([64.18.0.36] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIDx-00080C-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:41 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx122.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:23:21 CST Received: (qmail 51894 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 19:01:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user.struts.apache.org> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 51854 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 19:01:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mtao002.wamu.net (HELO mtao002.wamu.net) (167.88.201.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:01:11 -0800 Received: from ([10.144.81.63]) by mtao002.wamu.net with ESMTP id KP-BYB33.65030046; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:59:58 -0800 Received: from EXMSEA005.us.wamu.net ([10.144.81.24]) by exisea010.us.wamu.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:59:58 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6556.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: ActionMessages and Struts-EL Tags Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:59:57 -0800 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ActionMessages and Struts-EL Tags Thread-Index: AcThuhxImnGue4sMSb6678f+zGi04AAVNuaA From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2004 18:59:58.0210 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B359620:01C4E20F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:93.56927/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 This isn't a Struts-EL issue. The "html:messages" tag can be used to iterate over either messages or errors, but not both. It defaults to errors. You can change it to iterate over messages by setting the "message" atttribute to "true". > -----Original Message----- > From: Hariharan V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:50 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: ActionMessages and Struts-EL Tags >=20 >=20 > In my application I want to differentiate b/w error and=20 > normal messages >=20 > Here is the code in my Controller=20 >=20 >=20 > ActionMessages messages =3D new ActionMessages(); > ActionMessages errors =3D new ActionMessages(); > =20 > messages.add("sample.message", new=20 > ActionMessage("sample.message")); > messages.add("sample.message2", new=20 > ActionMessage("sample.message2")); > =20 > errors.add("sample.error", new=20 > ActionMessage("sample.error")); > errors.add("sample.error2", new=20 > ActionMessage("sample.error2")); >=20 > super.addMessages(req, messages); > super.addErrors(req, errors); >=20 >=20 > in my jsp I have added following piece of code >=20 > <html-el:errors/> >=20 > <html-el:messages id=3D"message"> > <c:out value=3D"${message}"/> =09 > </html-el:messages> =09 >=20 > But the problem is that I see only error messages in=20 > the output ,=20 > I don't get hold of my normal messages using <html-el:messages> tag. >=20 > Sample Error > Sample Error2 >=20 > Sample Error > Sample Error2=20 >=20 > Resource Bundle entries >=20 > sample.error=3DSample Error > sample.error2=3DSample Error2 > sample.message=3DSample Message > sample.message2=3DSample Message2 >=20 > Is anything wrong with the way Iam storing errors and normal messages >=20 > --=20 > -Hari >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=20 >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:20:53 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:20:53 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:53 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeIE9-00080a-00 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:53 -0800 Received: from source ([209.239.33.40]) by exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:23:32 EST Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by host24.websitesource.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id iBEJNWgp024431 for [email protected]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:23:32 -0500 Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:21:41 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: *istD auto focus woes Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:21:42 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/134770 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 Nope, Anthony! I meant what I said, but perhaps I express my self badly in English. By "ahead" I actually meant "before" the object or closer to the camera. By "behind" I meant between the object and infinity. I guess we are really trying to say the same thing :-). Anyway, I have never done photographs whith the *ist D, where the margins of focus was so narrow, that I have noticed any focusing problems. Perhaps I should do some testing? Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Anthony Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 14. december 2004 05:50 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: *istD auto focus woes Jens, I think you meant 1/3 AHEAD and 2/3 BEHIND the focusing distance. It's easy to verify this. Look at the DOF scale on a lens (you'll probably need an old lens to check this) and you'll see that the far-side limit of DOF encompasses more metres, feet or furlongs (as is your wont) between itself and the focusing mark, than falls between the near-side limit of DOF and the focusing mark. regards, Anthony Farr > -----Original Message----- > From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > An old rule of thumb used to be, that the DOF lies 1/3 behind and 2/3 ahead > of the focusing distance. So I guess a little behind is perhaps better than > a little ahead :-). > > Jens Bladt >
