Ah, I saw a story on this somewhere and it quoted a scientist as saying some huge amount of force would have been needed to cause this one, which involved a fault, remember. Now, I could be wrong, but I don't know of any faults off New York so presumably it would take even more?
If I come across the story again I'll post it. Well, ok, here is a different one.... http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,11867010%5E24217,00.html Dana On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 19:40:16 -0500, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So the latest Arab conspiracy theory is that the tsunami was an Israeli > nuclear test with help from America and maybe India. Got to love these > governments (they run the papers). > Why am I bringing it up? Because I'm wondering how much explosive force would > really be needed to cause such a tsunami? Could a ship full of explosives be > set off (maybe sunk and set off) off the coast of NY and cause a tsunami? Is > it all science fiction or is it physically possible. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:141833 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
