But publishing the "facts" was racist in that particular case. They manipulated the science to prove a point that the facts didn't support. The reason they did this was to prove that race was a significant differentiation in IQ.
It's not a "they could be right, you could be right, we'll never know." It was purely racial. Jerry Johnson Web Developer Dolan Media Company >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/18/05 12:29PM >>> > Jerry wrote: > This book was called the Bell Curve, and it was completely, utterly wrong. Whether the science was right or wrong is not the point. Assuming you're right, and it wasn't, publishing the facts isn't racist. (although it might be - the author may be, who knows? Or you may be wrong and the science may be right.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:143158 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
