>
> By this argument, we could exclude any group from children's telivision.
>  Only show black people if you want to explicitly talk about race
> relations.  Only show Jewish people if you are going to explicitly talk
> about religious tolerance.  Only show citrus farmers if you're going to
> talk about the four food groups.  It feels like you are setting
> homosexuality in a category all by itself, rather than just another
> tolerance issue in everyday life.
>
> I think a saner and healthier way to deal with it is to show homosexual
> relationships but *not* make a big deal out of it by highlighting it or
> going into depth about it.  After all, if you make too much of a
> production over something, people start to wonder why.
>
> --Ben
>

Hmm, very good post and I agree with your ideas. You can't really ignore 
sexuality, and I see your point that the sooner you show the normalcy of all 
different sexual orientations, the better.

This is good stuff ta learn before I have kids.

Thanks for all the discussion.....






~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:144877
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to