who knows? At this point, who cares? Historians maybe, but it's irrelevant to current foreign policy. Just like Dan Rather. Personally I think he is getting a bum rap, but he no longer matters.
By the way, the policy I am talking about lives in an executive order signed shortly after 9/11. If Clinton had a similar order, bad Bill, bad! but it doesn't make any difference to NOW unless Hillary runs. I have heard all these years about how the Republicans are about taking responsibility, but this one mainly whines a lot about how it's not his fault, honest. Dana On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:19:19 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 19:46:50 -0600, Dana wrote: > > But are they right? Are they lying? Who > > knows? > > I agree, we need more info to pass judgement. > > As for Clinton, Ledeen was just pointing out that Bush is taking the > heat for not changing Clintons policy. Why didn't the press say > anything back then? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:149789 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
