Well I think they should so lets agree not to agree.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:45:45 -0600, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Actually the State (Greer) said let her die because (he) previously > > decided she's PVS and he can't overturn his own ruling, or doesn't > > want to. > > I'm pretty sure what's going on is this: > > 1.) Congress and the President passed legislation that says in this > particular case a federal court can review a state court's ruling > possible suspending it via an injunction. > > 2.) The Schindler's appeal for an injunction was reivewed on 4 points, > 3 of which the federal judge said the Schindlers "won" such as without > the injunction the Schindlers would be harmed more than the Schiavos. > > 3.) The point they lost on for the injunction was whether the > Schindlers has a substantial likelyhood of proving that Mrs. Schiavo's > rights granted under the 14th amendment had been violated. > > That is, the Schindlers were contending that their daughter was being > deprived of life without due process, but the federal judge ruled that > it was doubtful they could prove this was the case. > > My issue is that the federal government shouldn't be sticking it's > nose in state's rights in the first place. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151332 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
