> Ian Skinner wrote: > The interesting thing his that historically that would be considerded very > UN-republican position. Small Governement and all that. >
That's the best part for us government cynics: the Republicans and their loudmouths like Rush, Bill, Sean, etc. have been preaching for years about: 1.) Government discretionary spending, 2.) State's rights, and 3.) Activist judges. And now they've shown absolute hypocrisy on every one. Now that we've got a full Republican government we should be living in a low-spending, local rights utopia but it's the exact opposite. As I said in a previous post, I think we're seeing history here. The big difference between Republicans and Democrats has always been that Democrats were a collection of special interests whereas Republicans shared a common ideology. What we're seeing is Republicans fracture into separate special interests like the anti-civil liberty people that favor revoking Schiavo's rights or banning gay marriage. Soon the Republican party will become unstable as Delay-like ethics violations and Schiavo-like hypocrisy rupture it. Rush's numbers will drop as the more reasonable listeners realize they've been listening to propaganda that appeals to the worst in them rather than "the truth". We may even see a new party emerge from people like McCain or Schwarzenegger ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151337 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
