Dickens is reasonably recent tho... this was pre-dickens I believe
that I remember that being said about (in the book Technopoly I
think... might have been Amusing Ourselves to Death, but I think it
was Technopoly -- Neil Postman - same author)... Relatively speaking,
Dickens wasn't long before the industrial revolution.

> I was about to say... and this is different from the
> present just how
> exactly? I really can't recall any substantive discussion
> of a
> substantive issue in recent years. I think you're wrong
> about poverty
> though; you should brush up on your Charles Dickens. At
> least we don't
> have workhouses any more.

> On a related note, I saw this on a bumper sticker today:

> Never have so few taken so much from so many


s. isaac dealey     954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework

http://macromedia.breezecentral.com/p49777853/
http://www.sys-con.com/author/?id=4806
http://www.fusiontap.com


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Purchase Captivate from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and 
support the CF community.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=52

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151888
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to