> Gradually reducing a tax while it's being eliminated is > bad? I'm not > sure I get your point there. I'd say any large tax being > eliminated > should be done so slowly.
> And it also sounds like you think that it's ok that the > second you die > the government gets a huge chunk of the money you earn > during your > lifetime? That you can't pass it all on to your children? > I understand that it's going to have an impact on tax > revenue, but > this is definitely one tax that IMHO should be eliminated. The point was that it's a tax that only affected the exceptionally wealthy. (Or such was my interpretation.) And since the wealthy won't be paying the tax, the government will find some other way to generate that revenue, generally speaking out of the pockets of those who can less afford it in the form of other taxes. Falls in the category of what Bill Clinton was talking about prior to the election -- receiving fantastic tax benefits because he's a member of the upper 1% (at the expense of the remaining 99). s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://macromedia.breezecentral.com/p49777853/ http://www.sys-con.com/author/?id=4806 http://www.fusiontap.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Homesite Plus with Dreamweaver from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=55 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:152427 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
