but even boneheaded moves have reasons usually. Was he trying to cover up Clinton administration carelessness about al-Qaeda? Or?
Dana On Apr 1, 2005 6:02 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it's anything that sinister. It sounds like he took the > documents intentionally, but not for any particularly nefarious purpose. It's > not like he was selling them to an Al Qaeda operative. He destroyed some of > the documents, but again, it doesn't look like there is any big secret that > he was trying to hide. It just seems to be a bonehead move on Berger's part. > > >Gruss wrote: > >The fact that this isn't happening says that something is up and none > >of them want whatever that is coming out. This is what politicians > >sound like when they're all scared. > > > >It's like being in the jungle at night when all of the noise stops. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:152613 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
