> Sam wrote: > You shouldn't make up numbers to support your theory.
I didn't make them up in that sense that I'm saying ~ 70% I've heard from that talk about this case. I'm not commenting on people I haven't heard from so 70% is only from my perspective and not definitive. > Sound policy logic would be to verify Terri was PVS before starving > her to death. The fact that cameras and test were not allowed stinks > of a cover-up. > You're right if you're saying that the policy should be that Mr. Schiavo decides; but that you think there's reasons to suspect Mr. Schiavo's motives. Of course after the death I would think that all of this could be investigated under a wrongful death lawsuit. If the question is how to prevent the death when a guardian is acting suspicious, I would think that's what the court cases were for. What you seem to be implying is that everyone in the town is, for some reason, allowing Ms. Schiavo to die. I don't see enough info to make that charge or to look for a motive, but you make some curious points, if true. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:152704 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
