> Matthew wrote: > There's no conspiracy, no real activism, and this is not > the earth-shattering case that everyone would like to believe it is. This > is simply a matter of guardianship. >
Well said. This also shows that the talk shows have brain washed people into thinking that anyone who disagrees with them must be part of a conspiracy or "biased". If the Supreme Court (who shouldn't have seen the case anyway and said so) felt Judge Greer had made a mockery of law, as Sam implies, they would've taken the case - or another court, maybe federal, would've overturned. The fact that they didn't has everyone saying "they didn't see the facts" but every judge I've talked to has said that Judge Greer did see the facts, but didn't believe them and the subsequent judges found he made a good call; which is why they didn't dig there. This also goes for the supreme court. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:153119 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
