Thought i was but they were going to wrong email for some reason (tg)! But the thing is at least you try sometimes Dana.
---------------------------------------- From: Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 7:40 PM To: CF-Community <[email protected]> Subject: Re: America's Insurgents hehe, let me tell you, most people here don't know that (duck just kidding). I know you've been around the site a long time. But, correct me if I am wrong, you weren't on *community* till just recently, right? I've tried answering the odd question, and usually turned out to be wrong. Maybe later ;) Love you too, Dana On Apr 11, 2005 2:35 PM, dave wrote: > well gee thanks, I have only been here for like 3 years but its only been > cf-cnn for the past lil while. > > Just cause you are not a cf wiz doesn't mean you can't speak up, espcially if > you know something because a lot of ppl get tired of answering the same ole > ?'s hundreds of times so instead they go unanswered because you'd rather be > here trying to discuss euthanasia, which I seriously doubt most ppl even know > anything about besides the defintion from dictionary.com. Which is great and > all and I wasnt trying to be rude WAS JUST FRIGGIN ASKING, only said it 20 > times now. > > ---------------------------------------- > From: Dana > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 12:08 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: America's Insurgents > > perhaps you mean pansy. On Kerry and on Shiavo, I don't think I care > to engage, thank you. Angry uninformed rants about covers it, thank > you, Ken. > > I did want to mention though that I am one of those people who rarely > speak up on CF-Talk. I can't speak for the others here -- there are > quite a few -- but in my case I don't run my mouth on CF-Talk because > unlike some people ::stare:: I am smart enough to know what I don't > know. > > I'm working my way through Adam Churvis' book on a very part-time > basis. I read CF-Talk but don't try to answer questions there. > Wouldn't it be a bit presumptuous of me to do so on a list where Ben > Forta answers questions at times? Seriously. When I ask questions I > ask them on CF-Newbie or offlist. Matter of fact seems to me you > yourself were talking to me about a bad query vs bad hosting company > question a while back here.... > > I dunno, maybe I am feeling defensive but the question you asked Gruss > is kinda rude and assumes membership requirements not in evidence. > Maybe the other community people here have similar reasons for being > quiet on talk, maybe not, but who appointed you list monitor? > > Sooo... having gotten all that off my chest, welcome to community, I > gather you didn't subscribe before. Fresh meat is always welcome :) > > ::tickle:: > > Dana > > On Apr 9, 2005 5:07 PM, dave wrote: > > least we dont have a panzy assed spineless wuss in office, so those > > "asshats" probably made things better for you ;) > > Guess its better to be an "asshat" than an "assdigger" that the other side > > had. > > > > And who gives a shit, she's dead, her wishes were to die if she was in that > > position, it's done, it's over and if you don't want that happening to you > > then make your damn will now > > and properly give it your your attorney and make your wishes known to > > everyone. SO that way if your parents, spouce or siblings aren't ready to > > let you go the decision wont be up to them as it shouldn't be. > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: Gruss Gott > > Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 6:59 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: America's Insurgents > > > > The asshats that swung the election Mr. Bush's way are beginning their > > insurgency: > > > > http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/04/09/rift_emerges_in_gop_after_schiavo_case/ > > > > [Conservative leaders] issued an ''action plan" to take their crusade > > for control of the nation's courts well beyond Senate debates over > > judicial nominees, pressing Congress to impeach judges and defund > > courts they consider ''activist" and to limit the jurisdiction of > > federal courts over some sensitive social matters ... > > > > [snip] > > > > Moore instead supports legislation to strip the Supreme Court of > > jurisdiction over cases in which public officials have cited God ''as > > the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government." > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:153507 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
