ok, what about the others?
 I'm sure his commanding officer(s) are lying as well..........

 I just googled it and c & p'd from first page that came up, didnt feel like c 
& p'ing the thousands of others.

----------------------------------------
From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:30 PM
To: CF-Community <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: America's Insurgents 

Interesting source you bring up " Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" nice
group - with several people who worked for the bush campaign in the
governing committee of SBVT. W've rehashed this quite a few times. Do
a search on Swift Boat. As a source this group has even less
credibility than the RNC.

On Apr 12, 2005 1:22 PM, dave  wrote:
> google it Larry, its full of info for ya
> 
> "We resent very deeply the false war crimes charges he made coming back from 
> Vietnam in 1971 and repeated in the book "Tour of Duty." We think those cast 
> an aspersion on all those living and dead, from our unit and other units in 
> Vietnam. We think that he knew he was lying when he made the charges, and we 
> think that they're unsupportable. We intend to bring the truth about that to 
> the American people. We believe, based on our experience with him, that he is 
> totally unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief."
> -- John O'Neill, spokesman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth
> 
> "I do not believe John Kerry is fit to be Commander-in-Chief of the armed 
> forces of the United States. This is not a political issue. It is a matter of 
> his judgment, truthfulness, reliability, loyalty and trust -- all absolute 
> tenets of command. His
> bio graphy, 'Tour of Duty,' by Douglas Brinkley, is replete with gross 
> exaggerations, distortions of fact, contradictions and slanderous lies. His 
> contempt for the military and authority is evident by even a most casual 
> review of this biography. He arrived in-country with a strong anti-Vietnam 
> War bias and a self-serving determination to build a foundation for his 
> political future. He was aggressive, but vain and prone to impulsive 
> judgment, often with disregard for specific tactical assignments. He was a 
> 'loose cannon.' In an abbreviated tour of four months and 12 days, and with 
> his specious medals secure, Lt.(jg) Kerry bugged out and began his infamous 
> betrayal of all United States forces in the Vietnam War. That included our 
> soldiers, our marines, our sailors, our coast guardsmen, our airmen, and our 
> POWs. His leadership within the so-called Vietnam Veterans Against the War 
> and testimony before Congress in 1971 charging us with unspeakable atrocities 
> remain an undocumented but nevert heless meticulous stain on the men and 
> women who honorably stayed the course. Senator Kerry is not fit for command."
> -- Rear Admiral Roy Hoffman, USN (retired), chairman, Swift Boat Veterans for 
> Truth
> ..
> "During Lt.(jg) Kerry's tour, he was under my command for two or three 
> specific operations, before his rapid exit. Trust, loyalty and judgment are 
> the key, operative words. His turncoat performance in 1971 in his grubby 
> shirt and his medal-tossing escapade, coupled with his slanderous lines in 
> the recent book portraying us that served, including all POWs and MIAs, as 
> murderous war criminals, I believe, will have a lasting effect on all 
> military veterans and their families.
> Kerry would be described as devious, self-absorbing, manipulative, disdain 
> for authority, disruptive, but the most common phrase that you'd hear is 
> 'requires constant supervision.'"
> -- Captain Charles Plumly, USN (retired)
> ..
> "Thirty-five years ago, many of us fell silent when we came back to the stain 
> of sewage that Mr. Kerry had thrown on us, and all of our colleagues who 
> served over there. I don't intend to be silent today or ever again. Our young 
> men and women who are serving deserve no less."
> -- Andrew Horne
> ..
> "In my specific, personal experience in both coastal and river patrols over a 
> 12-month period, I never once saw or heard anything remotely resembling the 
> atrocities described by Senator Kerry. If I had, it would have been my 
> obligation to report them in writing to a higher authority, and I would 
> certainly have done that. If Senator Kerry actually witnessed or participated 
> in these atrocities or, as he described them, 'war crimes,' he was obligated 
> to report them. That he did not until later when it suited his political 
> purposes strikes me as opportunism of the worst kind. That he would malign my 
> service and that of his fellow sailors with no regard for the truth makes him 
> totally unqualified to serve as commander-in-Chief."
> -- Jeffrey Wainscott
> ..
> "I signed that letter because I, too felt a deep sense of betrayal that 
> someone who took the same oath of loyalty as I did as an officer in the 
> United States Navy would abandon his group here (points to group photo) to 
> join this group here (points to VVAW protest photo), and come home and 
> attempt to rally the American public against the effort that this group was 
> so valiantly pursuing.
> It is a fact that in the entire Vietnam War we did not lose one major battle. 
> We lost the war at home... and at home, John Kerry was the Field General."
> -- Robert Elder
> ..
> "My daughters and my wife have read portions of the book 'Tour of Duty.' They 
> wanted to know if I took part in the atrocities described. I do not believe 
> the things that are described happened. Let me give you an example. In 
> Brinkley's book, on pages 170 to 171, about something called the 'Bo De 
> massacre' on November 24th of 1968... In Kerry's description of the 
> engagement, first he claimed there were 17 servicemen that were wounded. 
> Three of us were wounded. I was the first..." -- Joseph Ponder
> ..
> "While in Cam Rahn Bay, he trained on several 24-hour indoctrination 
> missions, and one special skimmer operation with my most senior and trusted 
> Lieutenant. The briefing from some members of that crew the morning after 
> revealed that they had not received any enemy fire, and yet Lt.(jg) Kerry 
> informed me of a wound -- he showed me a scratch on his arm and a piece of 
> shrapnel in his hand that appeared to be from one of our own M-79s. It was 
> later reported to me that Lt.(jg) Kerry had fired an M-79, and it had 
> exploded off the adjacent shoreline. I do not recall being advised of any 
> medical treatment, and probably said something like 'Forget it.' He later 
> received a Purple Heart for that scratch, and I have no information as to how 
> or whom. Lt.(jg) Kerry was allowed to return to the good old USA after 4 
> months and a few days in-country, and then he proceeded to betray his forme r 
> shipmates, calling them criminals who were committing atrocities. Today we 
> are here to tell you that just the opposite is true. Our rules of engagement 
> were quite strict, and the officers and men of Swift often did not even 
> return fire when they were under fire if there was a possibility that 
> innocent people -- fishermen, in a lot of cases -- might be hurt or injured. 
> The rules and the good intentions of the men increased the possibility that 
> we might take friendly casualties."
> -- Commander Grant Hibbard, USN (retired)
> ..
> "Lt. Kerry returned home from the war to make some outrageous statements and 
> allegations... of numerous criminal acts in violation of the law of war were 
> cited by Kerry, disparaging those who had fought with honor in that conflict. 
> Had war crimes been committed by US forces in Vietnam? Yes, but such acts 
> were few and far between. Yet Lt. Kerry have numerous speeches and testimony 
> before Congress inappropriately leading his audiences to believe tha t what 
> was only an anomaly in the conduct of America's fighting men was an epidemic. 
> Furthermore, he suggested that they were being encouraged to violated the law 
> of war by those within the chain of command. Very specific orders, on file at 
> the Vietnam archives at Texas Tech University, were issued by my father 
> [Admiral Elmo Zumwalt] and others in his chain of command instructing 
> subordinates to act responsibly in preserving the life and property of 
> Vietnamese civilians."
> -- Lt. Col. James Zumwalt, USMC (retired)
> ..
> "We look at Vietnam... after all these years it is still languishing in 
> isolated poverty and helplessness and tyranny. This is John Kerry's legacy. I 
> deeply resent John Kerry's using his Swift boat experience, and his betrayal 
> of those who fought there as a stepping-stone to his political ambitions."
> -- Barnard Wolff
> ..
> "In a whole year that I spent patrolling, I didn't see anything like a war 
> crime, an atrocity, anything like that. Time and again I saw American 
> fighting men put themselves in graver danger trying to avoid... collateral 
> damage. When John Kerry returned to the country, he was sworn in front of 
> Congress. And then he told my family -- my parents, my sister, my brother, my 
> neighbors -- he told everyone I knew and everyone I'd ever know that I and my 
> comrades had
> committed unspeakable atrocities."
> -- David Wallace
> ..
> "I served with these guys. I went on missions with them, and these men served 
> honorably. Up and down the chain of command there was no acquiescence to 
> atrocities. It was not condoned, it did not happen, and it was not reported 
> to me verbally or in writing by any of these men including Lt.(jg) Kerry. In 
> 1971, '72, for almost 18 months, he stood before the television audiences and 
> claimed that the 500,000 men and women in Vietnam, and in combat, were all 
> villains -- there were no heroes. In 2004, one hero from the Vietnam War has 
> appeared, running for President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief. 
> It just galls one to think about it."
> -- Captain George Elliott, USN (retired)
> ..
> "During the Vietnam War I was Task Force Commander at An Thoi, and my tour of 
> duty was 13 months, from the end of Tet to the beginning of the 
> vietnamization of the Navy units. Now when I went there right after Tet, I 
> was restricted in my movements. I couldn't go much of anyplace because the 
> Vietcong controlled most of the area. When I left, I could go anywhere I 
> wanted, just about. Commerce was booming, the buses were running, trucks were 
> going, the waterways were filled with sampans with goods going to market, but 
> yet in Kerry's biography he says that our operations were a complete failure. 
> He also mentions a formal conference with me, to try to get more air cover 
> and so on. That conference never happened..." -- Captain Adrian Lonsdale, 
> USCG (retired) .
> 
> "I was in An Thoi from June of '68 to June of '69, covering the whole period 
> that John Kerry wa s there. I operated in every river, in every canal, and 
> every off-shore patrol area in the 4th Corps area, from Cambodia all the way 
> around to the Bo De River. I never saw, even heard of all of these so-called 
> atrocities and things that we were supposed to have done. This is not true. 
> We're not standing for it. We want to set the record straight."
> -- William Shumadine
> 
> "In 1971, when John Kerry spoke out to America, labeling all Vietnam veterans 
> as thugs and murderers, I was shocked and almost brought to my knees, because 
> even though I had served at the same time and same unit, I had never 
> witnessed or participated in any of the events that the Senator had accused 
> us of. I strongly believe that the statements made by the Senator were not 
> only false and inaccurate, but extremely harmful to the United States' 
> efforts in Southeast Asia and the rest of the world. Tragically, some 
> veterans, scorned by the antiwar movement and their allies, retreated to a 
> life of despair and sui cide. Two of my crewmates were among them. For that 
> there is no forgiveness. "
> -- Richard O'Meara
> ..
> "My name is Steve Gardner. I served in 1966 and 1967 on my first tour of duty 
> in Vietnam on Swift boats, and I did my second tour in '68 and '69, involved 
> with John Kerry in the last 2 1/2 months of my tour. The John Kerry that I 
> know is not the John Kerry that everybody else is portraying. I served 
> alongside him and behind him, five feet away from him in a gun tub, and 
> watched as he made indecisive moves with our boat, put our boats in jeopardy, 
> put our crews in jeopardy... if a man like that can't handle that 6-man crew 
> boat, how can you expect him to be our Commander-in-Chief?"
> -- Steven Gardner
> ..
> "I served in Vietnam as a boat officer from June of 1968 to July of 1969. My 
> service was three months in Coastal Division 13 out of Cat Lo, and nine 
> months with Coastal Division 11 based in An Thoi. John Kerry was in An Thoi 
> the same time I was. I'm here today to e xpress the anger I have harbored for 
> over 33 years, about being accused with my fellow shipmates of war 
> atrocities. All I can say is when I leave here today, I'm going down to the 
> Wall to tell my two crew members it's not true, and that they and the other 
> 49 Swiftees who are on the Wall were then and are still now the best."
> -- Robert Brant
> ..
> "I never saw, heard of, or participated in any Swift boat crews killing 
> cattle, poisoning crops, or raping and killing civilians as charged by John 
> Kerry, both in his book and in public statements. Since we both operated at 
> the same time, in the same general area, and on the same missions under the 
> same commanders, it is hard to believe his claims of atrocities and poor 
> planning of Sea Lord missions. I signed this letter because I feel that he 
> used Swift boat sailors to proclaim his antiwar statements after the war, and 
> now he uses the same Swift boat sailors to support his claims of being a war 
> hero. He cannot have it both ways, an d we are here to ask for full 
> disclosure of the proof of his claims."
> -- James Steffes
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> From: "Larry C. Lyons" 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:41 AM
> To: CF-Community 
> Subject: Re: America's Insurgents
> 
> So give some legitimate citations instead of personal insults. Wall
> Street Journal, LA Herald, Seattle Times, Washington Post or the
> Washington Times would be a good starter.
> 
> Otherwise for all we know Without an independent source how do we
> know that you are not simply spewing bullshit.
> 
> On Apr 11, 2005 10:50 PM, dave wrote:
> > If it means that much to you, then I am sure you can google it and find it.
> >
> > So anything you don't read or listen to must be a "propaganda" station?
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:153634
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to