" it would take money to beat Bush" no actually it takes money to get bush ;) jk
---------------------------------------- From: Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:21 PM To: CF-Community <[email protected]> Subject: Re: America's Insurgents I seem to recall a comment after cone of the early caucuses that it would take money to beat Bush. That may have been the calculation. On Apr 12, 2005 11:44 AM, Ken Ketsdever wrote: > The Dems couldn't field a decent challenger. I don't know how he won the > nomination. I think an awful lot of the country would have liked to see Bush > ousted but didn't see Kerry as an better alternative. I think that made as > much difference as anything. It was also a huge mistake to run on what either > of them did 30 years ago. > > Mr. Kerry's mistake was thinking that just because he attended the > dance he'd be elected king. He never recovered from the swift boat > debacle which cost him the swing vote. Chasing the youth vote was the > nail in the coffin. > > Put another way, it was an extremely close election that was won on > strategy rather than mandate; which is why Mr. Bush's numbers have > gone back to the toilet. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:153635 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
