> Dana wrote: > I have a tiny bit of time and wondered - what is it exactly that you > object to in this discussion of Michael Schiavo?
1.) Measuring Mr. Schiavo against an utterly subjective abuser profile. The only type of profile that should be used is a scientifically derived objective one. For example, I think that you can say that if a person is a male black over 18, there's a 50% chance he's been to jail. I doubt you can say any such repeatable, provable thing about abusers. That means your accusation is based on a completely subjective profile, which is to say baseless, and therefore immoral. 2.) Accusing Mr. Schiavo of being an abuser with no physical evidence and little to no circumstantial evidence. 3.) Insulting virtually everyone connected to the case by implying they're idiots who can't see the truth of Mr. Schiavo's abuse. (Since, if there was, they could've used it to disqualify him from guardianship). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:153826 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
