> Dana wrote: > wondered. That *is* a court case where beyond a reasonable doubt is > required and put it this way, I hope you are right. I just find it > difficult to construct a conspiracy theory that involves ALL of those > people. >
As to the current case I think it's been totally botched by the prosecution and if he's convicted it'll only be due to a presumption of guilt by the jury or new information. Whether he's actually guilty? I don't know. He's definitely a weirdo, and there's been plenty of allegations, but are they because he's a weirdo, because he's rich, both, or because he's guilty? I'd lean guilty, but I have reasonable doubt. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:154374 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
