not following the case enough to be really sure. A lot depends on the credibility of the current accuser and his family. I find it disturbing that this is not the first time -- the first time I was really inclined to say there is a reasonable doubt -- but there are a LOT of witnesses and granted that a lot of them have some agenda, if they are agreeing with each other.... hmm.
There is also the co-sleeping issue, which is beyond bizarre when done with other people's children. If a small child is comforted by sleping with a parent, then fine, it's sweet and appropriate, but MJ was not a parent to these children and this appears to have been done for his benefit not the child's. So even if non-sexual this strikes me as slightly predatory. Dana On 4/18/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana wrote: > > wondered. That *is* a court case where beyond a reasonable doubt is > > required and put it this way, I hope you are right. I just find it > > difficult to construct a conspiracy theory that involves ALL of those > > people. > > > > As to the current case I think it's been totally botched by the > prosecution and if he's convicted it'll only be due to a presumption > of guilt by the jury or new information. > > Whether he's actually guilty? I don't know. He's definitely a > weirdo, and there's been plenty of allegations, but are they because > he's a weirdo, because he's rich, both, or because he's guilty? I'd > lean guilty, but I have reasonable doubt. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:154376 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
