So they nuke once of out cities, we retailate and nuke every one of theirs, heh. Surely they don't think they stand a chance against the allies. Does anyone know if it's policy to retaliate with nukes if we're hit with one? I seem to remember reading somewhere that it is
On 5/2/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So if we hold direct talks, or any talks at all, does anybody here think > this guy will really hold up to his end of the bargain? > > I'm not saying we need to invade yet, I'm just saying. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:50 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: NKorea tests Missile, bringing us all a little closer to WWIII > > > > "WASHINGTON (CNN) -- North Korea apparently tested a short-range > > missile Sunday, the Bush administration said, the latest in a string > > of recent incidents to refocus international attention on the Korean > > Peninsula's nuclear standoff." > > <snip> > > "The day before the apparent test, North Korea called President Bush a > > "hooligan" and said it expected no solution of the international > > standoff over its nuclear program during the current U.S. > > administration" > > <snip> > > "Also Thursday, a Defense Department intelligence official said North > > Korea has the "theoretical capability" to arm a missile with a nuclear > > device and strike the United States." > > <snip> > > Sen. Carl Levin, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, > > said on "Late Edition" that Sunday's test shows the Bush > > administration's refusal to hold direct talks with Pyongyang is > > leading to an even greater nuclear threat. > > <snip> > > The test, Levin said, is "additional, very discouraging evidence that > > this administration's policy towards North Korea is failing. We've had > > a lot of other evidence in the last four years -- the fact that they > > have renewed their reprocessing program of plutonium; the fact that > > they're now enriching uranium; and the fact they apparently can now > > put a nuclear weapon on a missile." > > <snip> > > "He said North Koreans "are living in poverty -- many in concentration > > camps. They do not have any exercise of democracy or freedom. They are > > not allowed to contact the outside world. [Kim] is not the kind of > > leader that is comfortable with the rest of the world."" > > <snip> > > Last week, U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lowell Jacoby > > testified on Capitol Hill that, according to a U.S. assessment, North > > Korea has the capacity to arm a missile with a nuclear device and hit > > U.S. territory. > > > > (Hmm...that doesn't sound 'theoretical' to me, earlier in the article > > didn't someone say 'Theoretically'?) > > > > I sense that the war hawks are leaning toward 'Regime Change', and > > with the hard line the BUsh Administration has been taken, and it's > > strong Rhetoric against North Korea they seem to be building things to > > the point where the only response will be a Military one. > > > > http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/05/01/northkorea.missile/index.html > > > > It's MONDAY! :) > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:156048 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
