> > You know it seems like any time I've seen people arguing about > free-speech the people who oppose it never seem to be able to produce > an example that is both an example of free-speech and not obviated by > some other law (like privacy or property laws). > > s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 > new epoch : isn't it time for a change? >
I've never seen an argument from someone who "opposes" free speech. The discussions generally center on where it begins, and where it is superceded by the very laws you mentioned. Plenty of examples can be given for these situations, without "opposing" free speech. Using the cross burning example, one person who supports free speech may see the right to burn a cross in their front yard as covered by this doctrine, whereas someone else who supports free speech may see this right superceded by the right of other people to not be subjected to such harrassment. Both can make valid arguments....hence the discussions/debates. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:156981 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
