This stuff was all over the uk press before the election, it's all pretty much true.
Labour won the election on a drastically reduced majority, general opinon seems to be that Blair is now a major liability to the party and a lame duck primeminister unlikely to be there in a years time. On 5/16/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brian wrote: > > Wow.....that was quite a diatribe. > > > > I gotta second that: wow! I also agree that the evidence seems very > shaky at this point. The things to keep in mind are: > > 1.) Many Americans support the war for reasons other than WMD even > though that was the lever used to get them out of their chair. > > 2.) Clinton was impeached because he lied under oath, not just because > his cigar was in Monica's hoo-haw. In fact had he just admitted that, > he wouldn't have been impeached. That means Mr. Bush would need to be > under investigation, he'd have to lie under oath, and there'd need to > be clear evidence to the contrary. Or at least the facts would have > to be very strong. At this point the ones you've posted aren't. > > 3.) Americans enjoy being lied to by their leaders and ask for it. > Why do you think Mr. Bush was re-elected? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:157701 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
