Do you offer an advanced course? I'm already familiar with c# and VB, but it would be nice to have some additional training in some selected topics to top off what I already know.
And one other thing... you invited me to dinner a couple of years ago if I ever came to Atlanta... :-) - Matt Small -----Original Message----- From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:20 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: ASP.net 2.0 It's good to see some *positive* CF-Community press on ASP.NET for a change! :) If you're interested in adding C# and ASP.NET 2.0 to your repertoire (always good for the job market), check this out: http://www.productivityenhancement.com/training/Itinerary.cfm?coursecode=CSH ARP It will make you a *much* better application designer and programmer. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Member of Team Macromedia http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com Download Plum and other cool development tools, and get advanced intensive Master-level training: * C# & ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers * ColdFusion MX Master Class * Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:09 AM Subject: RE: ASP.net 2.0 > Honestly, I do like it better for two main reasons: > > 1) OOP - rally using OOP is nice because I've actually written libraries of > objects that I can reuse across websites. > > 2) Webforms - Being able to respond to events without worrying about the > rest of the information on the form is an advancement in web programming > light-years ahead of any technology that does not use it. > > - Matt Small > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:05 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: ASP.net 2.0 > > It's all a natural progression. I liked Commodore Basic. Then Turbo > Pascal came along. Then Turbo C came along. Then Borland Builder > came along. Then CF came along. Finally, DotNet is showing some > maturity and ease of use. Someday I just might like it better than > CF. :) > > > On 5/18/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmmm... not too funny. Not that I use CF all that much anymore myself, > but if CF loses its status as the only "RAD" server technology, there won't > be ANY reason to use it over .NET. > > > > - Matt Small > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eric Carlisle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:50 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: ASP.net 2.0 > > > > It's hilarious... > > <asp:cfquery stolenfrom="ColdFusion"/> > > > > Marlon Moyer wrote: > > > > >I'm reading a book about ASP.NET 2.0 that's produced by MSFT. It's > > >cracking me up though because they keep talking about how easy CFQuery > > >is compared to ASP.NET 1.0 and how they learned from it in ASP.NET > > >2.0. I have to agree with them though, they did learn a lot from CF. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:158039 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
