http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/1999/277.shtml http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/news/9607/25/livingstone.hrc/index.shtml
Funny you should mention Rush :) I was just reading this and wanted to sher: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_060105/content/america_s_anchorman.member.html Move forward to Nixon, '72. The second powerful template created made media able, in their minds, to get rid of what they considered to be a corrupt president. Why was Nixon corrupt? They hated Nixon for two reasons. They actually should have loved Nixon. Nixon gave them a domestic agenda that JFK never gave them. Nixon gave them OSHA, he gave them the EPA, he gave them affirmative action, he gave them all kinds of liberal domestic agenda items. Nixon set up his domestic agenda. They should have loved him, but they hated Nixon for two reasons. He defeated Helen Gahagan Douglas in a California race and he exposed Alger Hiss as a traitor. Hiss was their fair-hired boy and they to this day have not gotten over that and Nixon was still to blame. So they were laying in wait for Nixon. They thought that Kennedy had dispatched him in 1960. Nixon comes back. They were laying in wait for him because of Helen Gahagan Douglas and Alger Hiss, and bammo, here you have this Watergate break-in that nobody to this day can explain why that break-in took place. Nobody knows. I mean, the people that know aren't talking. And of course that break-in is what led to all these other things that were going on and the press now is orgying on the memory and the legacy of that era in Watergate and to a secondary level the war in Vietnam era, and so they try to get this president. But there's a difference today, folks. Even Tom Brokaw acknowledged it last night on MSNBC on a one hour special that Chris Matthews did after a one hour show on this. And it is that they don't have the power to totally dominate and influence American culture anymore. Their monopoly is gone. They haven't the power and that's another reason why they're frustrated. Were this 1972, George W. Bush would have been gone with that National Guard story. George Bush would have been gone before the National Guard story were it not for the fact that an alternative media has sprung up. So they don't have the power. This frustrates them. So they try even harder, and that's what Gitmo is about, and that's what Abu Ghraib is all about, getting George W. Bush. It's not about making America the best shining city on a hill. It's not about making sure America never tortures and never breaks the rules or America doesn't do anything wrong. It's about getting Bush. And this whole orgy of the last 24 hours since Felt identified himself as Deep Throat is evidence, proof positive, that the effort to get Bush is the son and father, the daughter, the children, the child -- if you will -- of the Watergate scandal. The media has given birth to Watergate here in 2000 and 2001 and, '2, '3, '4 and now '5 in their attempts to get Bush. On 6/2/05, Dana wrote: > A conspiracy in the White House? To impede a crimininal investigation? > Is NOT bad? > > I suppose I need to ask for a reference on the bar bouncer -- don't > recall anything of the kind and suspect the story is Rush having DT's. > Bring on the link, let's have a look at it. But it won't make > Watergate OK, you know, even if it turns out to be actual fact. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:159497 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
