judicialwatch. Now that's a nice objective source for ya. As for Rush... yeah, DT's is about right. Pshaw I say. If Bush was my kid's Sunday school teacher I might ask him to dinner. Since he's the president that is screwing around with the first amendment, I condemn him in the same terms I would condemn any other president doing the same thing.
Dana On 6/2/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/1999/277.shtml > http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/news/9607/25/livingstone.hrc/index.shtml > > Funny you should mention Rush :) > I was just reading this and wanted to sher: > http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_060105/content/america_s_anchorman.member.html > > Move forward to Nixon, '72. The second powerful template created made > media able, in their minds, to get rid of what they considered to be a > corrupt president. Why was Nixon corrupt? They hated Nixon for two > reasons. They actually should have loved Nixon. Nixon gave them a > domestic agenda that JFK never gave them. Nixon gave them OSHA, he > gave them the EPA, he gave them affirmative action, he gave them all > kinds of liberal domestic agenda items. Nixon set up his domestic > agenda. They should have loved him, but they hated Nixon for two > reasons. He defeated Helen Gahagan Douglas in a California race and he > exposed Alger Hiss as a traitor. Hiss was their fair-hired boy and > they to this day have not gotten over that and Nixon was still to > blame. So they were laying in wait for Nixon. They thought that > Kennedy had dispatched him in 1960. Nixon comes back. They were laying > in wait for him because of Helen Gahagan Douglas and Alger Hiss, and > bammo, here you have this Watergate break-in that nobody to this day > can explain why that break-in took place. Nobody knows. I mean, the > people that know aren't talking. And of course that break-in is what > led to all these other things that were going on and the press now is > orgying on the memory and the legacy of that era in Watergate and to a > secondary level the war in Vietnam era, and so they try to get this > president. But there's a difference today, folks. Even Tom Brokaw > acknowledged it last night on MSNBC on a one hour special that Chris > Matthews did after a one hour show on this. And it is that they don't > have the power to totally dominate and influence American culture > anymore. Their monopoly is gone. They haven't the power and that's > another reason why they're frustrated. > > Were this 1972, George W. Bush would have been gone with that National > Guard story. George Bush would have been gone before the National > Guard story were it not for the fact that an alternative media has > sprung up. So they don't have the power. This frustrates them. So they > try even harder, and that's what Gitmo is about, and that's what Abu > Ghraib is all about, getting George W. Bush. It's not about making > America the best shining city on a hill. It's not about making sure > America never tortures and never breaks the rules or America doesn't > do anything wrong. It's about getting Bush. And this whole orgy of the > last 24 hours since Felt identified himself as Deep Throat is > evidence, proof positive, that the effort to get Bush is the son and > father, the daughter, the children, the child -- if you will -- of the > Watergate scandal. The media has given birth to Watergate here in 2000 > and 2001 and, '2, '3, '4 and now '5 in their attempts to get Bush. > > > On 6/2/05, Dana wrote: > > A conspiracy in the White House? To impede a crimininal investigation? > > Is NOT bad? > > > > I suppose I need to ask for a reference on the bar bouncer -- don't > > recall anything of the kind and suspect the story is Rush having DT's. > > Bring on the link, let's have a look at it. But it won't make > > Watergate OK, you know, even if it turns out to be actual fact. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:159501 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
